'Your call is valued' voted most irritating phone phrase
People would rather be told how long they are going to have to wait or offered a call back
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Consumers have voted the phrase “your call is valued” the most annoying thing to hear while waiting for a company to answer the phone.
Some 47 per cent of people questioned by consumer group Which? found the words to be the most irritating, while 28 per cent said it was worse to be directed to a company's website.
Only around one in 10 of 2,260 people surveyed found the honest, but somewhat obvious, statement "all operators are busy" to be the most annoying.
Which? also asked respondents what sounds, other than words, they least liked to hear.
The findings justified the idea of playing music for people on hold: the largest proportion of respondents, 29 per cent, said they were most annoyed by just a busy tone, while 22 per cent disliked rock music.
Around half of those polled said classical music was their favourite sound to hear while waiting for their call to be picked up.
In terms of words and statements, the survey found that people most liked practical information.
A third wanted to be told average call waiting times; about the same number preferred to be informed of their position in the queue. And 30 per cent just wanted to be offered a call back.
Ultimately though, it looked like there was little companies could do to appease people on hold for too long; 93 per cent of respondents believed they should never have to wait longer than five minutes before their call is answered.
Which? magazine editor Richard Headland said: “Waiting on hold is a waste of time, but some organisations make the experience needlessly annoying through objectionable messages and music.
‘‘If these drive you round the bend, vote with your feet and take your custom elsewhere. The best companies know the value of answering your call quickly.’’
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments