Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit legal challenge: The full judgment that ruled MPs must vote on Britain leaving EU

'Government does not have power under the Crown's prerogative to give notice pursuant to Article 50'

Peter Walker
Thursday 03 November 2016 12:32 GMT
Comments
(Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Senior High Court judges have ruled UK MPs must vote on leaving the European Union in the most extraordinary and unexpected twist in the Brexit story.

The Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas said Theresa May alone does "not have power" to trigger Article 50.

Lead campaigner Gina Miller, who brought the case, said the government should make the “wise decision of not appealing” and that the judgment was about “all our futures”.

The pound has also enjoyed a 1 per cent rise on the dollar, the biggest jump since August, in the aftermath.

The dramatic bombshell judgment has sparked outrage among pro-Brexit politicians, including Nigel Farage, who said “they have no idea the level of public anger they will provoke”.

The landmark ruling however surrounded a complicated network of unwritten constitution law and historical background.

Here, The Independent brings you the full 32-page judgment. And below, is the court's full two-page summary.

For more, follow our live blog here.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in