EU rejects UK calls to ‘refine’ Brexit deal’s Northern Ireland protocol

European Commission vice president says Northern Ireland protocol is 'only way to protect the Good Friday Agreement'

Kate Ng
Thursday 11 February 2021 00:10
Comments
A Unionist sign protesting against the NI Protocol is seen in Larne town centre
A Unionist sign protesting against the NI Protocol is seen in Larne town centre

The EU has rejected the UK government’s calls to redraw the Brexit deal’s Northern Ireland protocol, as a senior European Commission official said it was the only way to protect the Good Friday Agreement.

A letter from the European Commission’s vice-president, Marcos Sefcovic, inflamed tensions on the eve of his meeting with Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove on Thursday in London, where they are due to discuss the problems faced in Northern Ireland as a result of the new trading arrangements.

Mr Sefcovic expressed concerns over “teething problems” over the implementation of the protocol in the letter to Mr Gove on Wednesday, but added that it was now “our mutually agreed legal obligation”.

The EU briefly triggered Article 16 during a row over Covid-19 vaccines, before quickly withdrawing. Unionists in Northern Ireland have since called for it to be ditched.

The protocol was designed to prevent a hard border with Ireland but has resulted in additional checks for goods crossing from Great Britain into Northern Ireland, which led to empty supermarket shelves and disruption at the border last month.

Article 16 overrides part of the protocol which prevents a hard border on the island of Ireland, and was intended as an emergency measure only.

Unionists regard the new checks as a border in the Irish Sea separating Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.

Northern Ireland’s first minister Arlene Foster urged Mr Gove and Boris Johnson to “act on” their unionist beliefs, adding that “it is important that they realise that part of the United Kingdom is being treated differently”.

She told ITV's Peston: “And actually if you look at the protocol it talks about respecting the fact that the sovereign territory of the United Kingdom as one, it also talks about respecting the internal market of the United Kingdom.

"I don't believe that the European Union is doing either of those things and so I believe it is up to our Government to challenge them on that and the fact that they are separating out Northern Ireland from the rest of the United Kingdom."

Mrs Foster described the issues with the protocol as “fundamental” and said: “You can’t even get a pot plant from Great Britain into Northern Ireland at the moment which is absolutely incredible.”

Mr Sefcovic’s letter was criticised by UUP leader Steve Aiken, who said it “reeks of arrogance and intransigence”.

He said the letter will to the opposite of “protecting the Belfast Agreement and defusing tensions”.

But Mr Sefcovic made it clear in his letter that the commission regards the protocol as the only way forward.

"The protocol is the solution agreed by the UK and the EU to these challenges: it is the only way to protect the Good Friday (Belfast) Agreement, preserving peace and stability and avoiding a hard border on the island of Ireland," he wrote.

"It is designed to ensure clarity and predictability for people and businesses, while minimising the disruption inevitably caused by the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. It is a balanced outcome after years of difficult negotiations and is now our mutually agreed legal obligation.

"I therefore agree that our shared objective is to work tirelessly in order to make the protocol work. It requires full and faithful implementation by both parties.

"The Union's commitment to the objectives of the protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland, as a cornerstone of both the Withdrawal Agreement and the relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom, is unwavering."

He also used the letter to set out concerns over the implementation of the protocol, writing that Border Control posts (BCPs) are not yet fully operational and official controls not performed in compliance with the Withdrawal Agreement protocol and EU rules.

Mr Sefcovic said the UK has “not yet fulfilled its obligation” to provide real-time access to all its IT systems, in particular access to key customs IT systems.

However, he wrote that he is convinced these are “teething problems, for which we should be able to find swift solutions”.

A UK government spokesperson said: "It is disappointing that the Commission has failed to acknowledge the shock and anger felt right across the community in Northern Ireland from its decision to trigger Article 16, and the need to take urgent steps to restore confidence as a result.

"The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster will underline the need for such action and political leadership in this regard when meeting with Vice-President Sefcovic in London tomorrow.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in