Theresa May will reportedly challenge MPs and peers to “defy the will of the people” if she loses a crucial Supreme Court battle on the right to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty.
It comes as Government lawyers prepare to present their case for triggering the untested mechanism of leaving the EU without an act of Parliament. The case, which will begin on Monday, is expected to reach a judgement in January and risks derailing the Prime Minister’s pledge to trigger Article 50 before the end of March.
According to The Daily Telegraph ministers have said there is an “expectation” they will lose the case – as they did in the High Court – and that the PM is already preparing to introduce a short three-line bill to allow MPs a vote on Article 50. But, the newspaper adds, allies of Ms May are “confident” MPs “would not dare” vote the legislation down.
“Theresa May has made clear that people bringing this legal action over Article 50 must not be allowed to thwart the will of the people … she will take exactly the same approach in the Commons when she addresses MPs.”
It is expected that around 80 MPs will vote against the legislation in the Commons. On Friday the newly elected Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Olney, who overturned her Conservative rival’s 23,000 majority, became the latest to go on record saying she will vote against Article 50. Ms Olney said the result in Richmond Park gave her a mandate to vote against Brexit.
One law professor earlier this week predicted that the PM is heading for an 11-0 defeat when the justices in the Supreme Court reach a decision. Professor Michael Zander QC said the High Court judges who ruled Ms May could not act alone when triggering the Article 50 notice had given a “unanimous and very strong” decision.
He wrote: “I would be surprised if the Attorney General and his team of supporting QCs and other lawyers have given ministers reason to hope that there was any great hope of the [High Court’s] unanimous and very strong decision being reversed.
“The appeal is to be heard in December – for the first time with all 11 [Supreme Court] justices sitting ... In my view, the Government could be looking at losing 11-0.”
Register for free to continue reading
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
Already have an account? sign in
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies