Britons more opposed to Syria air strikes since Commons vote

More than half of Labour supporters now disapprove of the bombing campaign, compared to a quarter in November

Jess Staufenberg
Monday 07 December 2015 14:44
Comments
Innocent people who oppose Isis will die as a result of British bombing, said Jeremy Corbyn
Innocent people who oppose Isis will die as a result of British bombing, said Jeremy Corbyn

Public support for air strikes in Syria is steadily dropping despite the Government's vote in favour of the measure, a poll has indicated.

Less than a week after MPs voted with a higher-than-expected majority to extend air strikes from Iraq into Syria, the YouGov survey showed public backing for the motion had dropped by 31 points.

Support had remained quite constant between mid September and 24 November, when around 58 to 60 per cent of the public were in favour of airborne raids on the war-torn country.

But by 3 December, only 44 per cent of Britons said they still agreed it was the right thing to do.

Labour supporters were most concerned about extending military action, with only 29 per cent in support of RAF air strikes the day after the Commons vote.

It is the sharpest drop among all the parties, with more than half of Labour supporters in favour when asked the same question earlier in November.

A total of 51 per cent of Labour voters said they now actively "disapproved", compared to a quarter who took that stance in November.

The results reflect paryy leader Jeremy Corbyn's staunch opposition to air strikes.

He has argued that the Labour supporters who overwhelmingly backed him in the party's leadership election do not want military striks, and has warned that British bombs will kill innocent people opposed to Isis if air strikes are extended.

In the Commons vote, 153 Labour MPs voted with their leader against bombing, while 66 defied him and voted with the Conservatives.

Jeremy Corbyn had allowed his MPs a free vote, rather than impose a three-line whip. Among Conservatives, 313 voted for the proposal and only 7 voted against military action.

During the debate, Mr Corbyn warned the Prime Minister that public opposition to his military plans was growing:

"The Prime Minister understands that public opinion is moving increasingly against [...] war. He wants to hold this vote before opinion against it grows even further," he told the Speaker.

Prime Minister David Cameron was criticised during the 11-hour debate after calling Mr Corbyn and shadow chancellor John McDonnell "terrorist sympathisers" in a private meeting.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in