Campaign to protect Freedom of Information Act boosted as UK's top civil servant opposes tough new rules

Sir Jeremy Heywood had previously said Freedom of Information legislation had a 'chilling effect' on Whitehall but is now understood to oppose fundamental reform of the Act

Matt Dathan
Online political reporter
Thursday 24 December 2015 12:25
Comments
Sir Jeremy Heywood has already held discussions with David Cameron about post-May 7
Sir Jeremy Heywood has already held discussions with David Cameron about post-May 7

The campaign to protect the Freedom of Information Act has been given a major boost after it emerged that Britain's top civil servant is understood to be opposed to controversial changes to the legislation.

Sir Jeremy Heywood, the Cabinet Secretary, had said earlier this year that the FOI rules had a "chilling effect" on the operation of Government but is now believed to be against reforms that would make it easier for public bodies to withhold information from members of the public.

Instead he wants to make the current rules of the Act clearer, according to The Times. Sir Jeremy is understood to want to make the rules over when ministers can block the release of information clearer to ensure greater consistency across government.

Sir Jeremy's position on the Government's review of the FOI Act will play a crucial role considering his influence inside Whitehall.

His opposition to plans such as imposing charges on requests for information and giving ministers and officials greater scope to block requests is a further sign that the review will not recommend a major overhaul of the legislation.

The FOI Act was brought in by Tony Blair but he later admitted the legislation was his biggest regret.

The Government commission looking into whether the legislation should be changed has been tasked to consider the "public interest balance" between oppenness and the protection of "sensitive information".

Earlier this week the minister in charge of the FOI Act, Matthew Hancock, said he was opposed to toughening the rules on the public obtaining information.

A senior source told The Times that Mr Hancock would be "very happy" if the inquiry came back with no changes.

Last week Labour's deputy leader Tom Watson accused David Cameron of wanting to "govern from the gloom" with his plans to curb FOI rules and claimed the review of the transparency legislation was out of touch with the public’s desire for more openness, a “waste of taxpayers’ money” and “predestined” to recommend raising barriers to obtaining information.

He said Mr Cameron was trying to “reverse the transparency Labour introduced” and seeking to “turn off the lights, systematically making it harder for people to engage with policy making, retreating into a darker and more secretive place".

Labour would strengthen and extend the FOI Act, he said.

Mr Cameron was criticised for appointing a commission full of opponents of the Act to look into reforming the legislation, including former Home Secretary Jack Straw, a vocal critic of the law despite playing a role in introducing it.

A Government spokesman refused to comment on Sir Jeremy’s views. “The Government is committed to freedom of information, and the vast majority of requests are handled within the time limit," the spokesman said.

“We are the most transparent Government ever, publishing more data on everything from ministerial meetings to the money we spend, and we are constantly striving to be even better.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in