MPs will only be allowed to debate a controversial free trade deal between the European Union and Canada after it has already been signed, the Government has said.
Liam Fox, the Secretary of State for International Trade, said in a letter to Parliament’s European Scrutiny Committee that the “parliamentary timetable” was such that a debate could not reasonable be scheduled before he signed the agreement.
The denial of parliamentary scrutiny ahead of the signing comes as the Government sidelines parliament in Brexit negotiations. Theresa May has refused to grant MPs a vote on the opening terms of negotiations with the EU.
Last week the regional parliament of the Belgian region Wallonia refused to allow the Belgian premier to sign the Ceta (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) deal. Britain’s parliament will however have no such veto over the plan – which campaigners say is the “little brother” of the controversial TTIP agreement being negotiated with the US.
They say it will allow corporations to sue governments who impose policies that harm their profits, give corporations a great role in shaping their own regulations and lock in the privatisation of public services.
The Government says the deal will reduce barriers to trade and increase prosperity.
Spain’s foreign minister said earlier this week that Britain’s post-Brexit trade deal with the EU would likely most closely resemble Ceta.
Mr Fox, who resigned in disgrace from the post of Defence Secretary under the 2010 Coalition government but was reappointed as Trade Secretary by Theresa May this year, intends to sign the agreement at an EU-Canada summit on 27 October. He will confirm his intention to sign it at a meeting of European ministers on Tuesday.
Britain’s backing for the plan comes despite it leaving the EU.
“The Government has always been willing to engage with Parliament on trade policy, and I appreciate the need for transparency and scrutiny,” Mr Fox said in a letter to the committee dated earlier this month.
“In this case, the parliamentary timetable is such that it would be difficult to schedule a debate ahead of the 18 October extraordinary Council on Foreign Affairs (Trade) where member states will be required to confirm their agreement to sign Ceta.
“I would, however, certainly welcome the opportunity for a debate ahead of the provisional application of Ceta, which is expected early next year.”
In a report, the European Scrutiny Committee said: “The committee requested an early debate of this legally and politically important trade deal ahead of signature, provisional application and conclusion.
“Nonetheless, we acknowledge the time constraints of scheduling a debate before signature given that there were only just over two sitting weeks between our recommendation and the FAC.
“Under these circumstances, the Committee agrees to a conditional scrutiny waiver for signature only.”
The committee’s members said the minister should report back to the Commons to explain what happened at the foreign affairs meeting, and also schedule a debate “urgently” so that MPs could actually consider the deal before it was implemented next year.
Register for free to continue reading
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
Already have an account? sign in
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies