Budget 2017: Cigarette prices could be increased for second time in a year

Average price of a pack could soar to more than £10 if Chancellor decides on second round of 'sin taxes'

Around ten million adults in the UK are smokers - in spite of the ever increasing cost
Around ten million adults in the UK are smokers - in spite of the ever increasing cost

Speculation has mounted about whether the cost of cigarettes is set to increase for a second time in a year in Wednesday’s Budget.

Since the Chancellor already announced an increase in the price of cigarettes in March, the UK’s 10 million smokers are hoping to be spared another hike, which could push the cost of the average pack to over £10.

This week’s Budget is unusual in that it will be the second one this year – which normally only happens when there is a change of government. Philip Hammond effectively gets a second bite of the cherry with the nation’s finances, because last year he announced the 2017 Autumn Statement would become an Autumn Budget, with a much smaller "Spring Statement" next year.

Tobacco is subject to an automatic, annual increase in duty of two per cent above the rate of inflation, with the average cost of 20 cigarettes standing at £9.91 in March after the spring budget slapped an extra 35p on a pack.

Mr Hammond is under close scrutiny with this budget following the debacle of the hastily-abandoned proposal to hike national insurance contributions for the self-employed in his March statement. Some commentators have suggested he will aim to please as many people as possible on Wednesday – and may choose to avoid so-called “sin taxes”.

Around one in five adults in the UK are regular smokers, despite the ever escalating cost of tobacco and continued public health campaigns warning of the risks. Many occasional and social smokers were affected when the EU announced it would no longer allow cigarettes to be sold in packs of ten and would only sell 20s – with some raising concerns this could cause people to smoke more.

On average, around 80 per cent of the price of a packet of cigarettes in the UK goes into the Government’s coffers – although it is as high as 90 per cent on some brands, according to the Tobacco Manufacturers Association, which lobbies on behalf of the industry.

Increasing numbers of smokers are buying their tobacco from abroad, with illegal imports a growing problem for HM Customs and Revenue – which estimates tobacco smuggling costs the UK taxpayer £2.4 billion a year.

Smokers’ rights campaign groups claimed a tax increase would negatively impact poorer people most, as they were more likely to smoke for a variety of reasons often related to stress and mental health problems including depression and anxiety. Simon Clark, director of the pro-tobacco lobby group Forest, said a price increase would "encourage more smokers to buy tobacco on the black market".

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in