Immigration minister James Brokenshire says plan to grant relatives of refugees asylum in UK is not 'sustainable'

He said the plan would also make the UK more attractive to future refugees

Charlie Cooper
Whitehall Correspondent
Tuesday 01 December 2015 19:49 GMT
Syrian refugees at a camp in Lebanon's eastern Bekaa Valley
Syrian refugees at a camp in Lebanon's eastern Bekaa Valley (Getty Images)

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas


Immigration minister James Brokenshire has said allowing elderly relatives and grown-up children of asylum seekers to join their relatives in the UK would not be “practical or sustainable”.

He said the plan to extend criteria for refugee “family reunions”, backed by Labour, the SNP, the Lib Dems and charities including the Red Cross, would also make the UK more attractive to future refugees.

Conservative MPs were expected last night to vote down an amendment to the Immigration Bill, which would allow the dependent parents, children over 18 and in some cases siblings of successful asylum seekers to join them in the UK. Currently only spouses and children under 18 are allowed under family reunion rules.

“Widening the criteria would be not practical or sustainable,” Mr Brokenshire said. “It would be a significant additional factor on how the UK may be viewed in terms of those who may choose different jurisdictions to make their asylum claims,” a process he referred to as “asylum shopping”.

The rules could still be changed if the House of Lords backs the amendment. If passed, it could lead to thousands more Syrian and other refugees eligible to resettle in the UK.

Labour’s Yvette Cooper, who is leading calls for the rules to change, asked Mr Brokenshire to consider the case of the 19-year-old daughter of a Syrian refugee family in the UK, left alone in the country because of 18-year cut-off point.

“What’s the option for that 19-year-old and so many other similar cases?” she asked.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in