Brexit: Senior Tory law officer quits in protest at Boris Johnson’s plan
Further blow for prime minister as Lord Keen of Elie steps down over Internal Markets Bill
Boris Johnson’s Brexit plans have suffered another blow after the government’s law officer for Scotland quit in protest despite an eleventh hour climbdown by the prime minister.
No 10 announced that MPs would be given a new “lock” before controversial powers contained in the Internal Markets Bill can be used.
But the concession was not enough to convince Lord Keen, the advocate general for Scotland and a member of the House of Lords, to stay in his post.
Mr Johnson is facing a rebellion on his own benches after a cabinet minister said that the bill, which is currently going through the Commons, does break international law “in a limited and specific way”.
Lord Keen of Elie’s position was cast into doubt after he contradicted Brandon Lewis, the Northern Ireland secretary, by telling peers that the controversial bill did not "constitute a breach of international law or of the rule of law".
He claimed that Mr Lewis had “answered the wrong question” in his comments to MPs.
But within hours Mr Lewis had reiterated his position, telling MPs that he had given “a very straight answer" last week.
In his resignation letter, Lord Keen told the prime minister he had found it “increasingly difficult” to reconcile his obligations as a law officer with the prime minister’s policy intentions.
His decision to step down came despite Mr Johnson bowing to demands by backbenchers to give MPs another vote before the powers can be used.
Many Tory MPs had been expected to vote for a similar amendment, tabled by the Tory MP Sir Bob Neill, next week.
The deal was brokered between Mr Johnson, Sir Bob and Damian Green, the chair of the One Nation caucus of Tory MPs.
But it will not satisfy all those with concerns around the bill, who fear the message it may send about Britain as a global power.
Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the US House of Representatives, has already warned that Congress will never pass a free trade agreement with the UK if legislation to override the Brexit divorce settlement were to "imperil" the Northern Ireland peace process.
However, Mike Pompeo, the US secretary of state, told a press conference that the US “trusted” Britain.
Robert Buckland, the justice secretary, has suggested that he might resign if the law were broken in a way he found “unacceptable”, while Tobias Ellwood, the Tory MP and chair of the Commons Defence Committee has compared No 10’s strategy to “Nixonian madman theory”.
The legislation has also come under fire from all five living former prime ministers, including Mr Johnson’s immediate predecessors Theresa May and David Cameron, as well as Brexit-backing Tory grandees such as former party leader Michael Howard and ex-chancellor Norman Lamont.
Earlier this week, the government suffered a blow when Tory MP Rehman Chishti resigned as the prime minister's special envoy on freedom of religion or belief in opposition to the disputed clauses in the bill.
In an attempt to quell the growing rebellion, Mr Johnson has accused the EU of underhand tactics and said the clauses are necessary to protect the status of Northern Ireland within the UK.
He told MPs this week that the bill “should be welcomed by everyone who cares about the sovereignty and integrity of our United Kingdom”.
Mr Johnson said he understood the concerns of those who felt unease over the measures, which he had no desire to use. They were an “insurance policy” that will not be invoked if there is a future trade deal with the EU, he said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies