Matt Hancock’s messy month – from being called ‘f**king hopeless’ to an alleged affair

Minister has been hit with barrage of claims from Dominic Cummings and called ‘poor man’ by the Queen

Adam Forrest
Friday 25 June 2021 14:20
Comments
<p>Health secretary Matt Hancock</p>

Health secretary Matt Hancock

Next month’s summer recess cannot come soon enough for Matt Hancock. The health secretary has endured a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad few weeks – capped off by photos showing a “steamy clinch” with a departmental aide.

The cabinet minister has said he is “very sorry” for breaching social distancing guidance after being caught with his adviser in a passionate embrace, but made clear he does not plan to resign.

He was already under pressure after punishing attacks from Dominic Cummings and the embarrassing revelation that his boss, Boris Johnson, had branded him “f****** hopeless” in a series of WhatsApp messages.

Even the Queen referred to Mr Hancock as that “poor man”. So how did the health secretary come to be at the centre of storm after storm at Westminster? And what are his chances of surviving the latest scandal?

Mr Hancock’s messy month began at the end of May, when Mr Cummings accused him of “criminal, disgraceful behaviour that caused serious harm” during the pandemic. The ex-No 10 adviser said he should have been fired for “15 to 20” different things.

Two weeks later, Mr Hancock was accused by Labour of being a “liar” and “trying to rewrite history” after he told a parliamentary inquiry there had never been a national shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE).

During his 10 July appearance, the health secretary rejected a series of allegations made by Mr Cummings – denying that he ever lied to the prime minister about Covid patients being discharged from hospitals into care homes.

Though he survived his four-hour grilling by MPs, things got worse for Mr Hancock on 16 June – when it became clear Mr Cummings wasn’t done with his least favourite minister.

The former Downing Street strategist released WhatsApp messages showing Mr Johnson had referred to Mr Hancock as “totally f**king hopeless” at the height of the first wave last spring.

Doorstepped by a reporter and asked if he was “hopeless”, Mr Hancock neither confirmed nor denied. He managed the strangely equivocal response: “I don’t think so.”

Hancock should have been fired for at ‘least 15-20 things’, Cummings says

The health secretary has also faced a significant rise in Covid-19 cases in the past few months, with Labour blaming the government’s failure to shut the borders and prevent the Delta variant from taking hold.

Labour’s shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth says his opposite number would be “forever branded hopeless Hancock”.

Earlier this week, the monarch was heard referring to Mr Hancock as that “poor man” during her first in-person audience with the prime minister in 15 months.

The Queen appeared to sympathise with the tough task the health secretary faced controlling a third wave, telling Mr Johnson that she had spoken to him at the privy council. “He’s full of...” she said, before the PM quickly interjected with the word “beans”.

Queen calls Hancock ‘poor man’ in first in-person audience with PM for 15 months

The exchange may have afforded Mr Hancock a chuckle. Little did he know his week was about to end with the most excruciating front page imaginable.

The Sun published photos of the health secretary embracing aide Gina Coladangelo, referring to it as a “steamy clinch”. The pair were spotted embracing on several occasions during the pandemic, sources told the newspaper.

Intense embarrassment aside, Mr Hancock is now facing demands for an investigation into the details of the alleged office affair to find out if a variety of rules may have been broken.

Matt Hancock with Gina Coladangelo

The photos were taken with social distancing rules still in place at workplaces – and two weeks before the ban on hugging between people in different households was lifted.

There are also questions about Mr Hancock’s appointment of Ms Coladangelo to a £15,000-a-year advisory role, since there was no public record of it.

So what happens now? He broke cover in a statement released by an aide on Friday, appealing for privacy for his family and saying he was “focused on working to get the country out of this pandemic”.

But at some point he will have to face up to questions on the history of his personal and professional relationship with Ms Coladangelo. His political future may depend on the responses he provides.

His colleague Grant Shapps will have hated having to answer for his actions on Friday. Other Tory ministers will resent having to do the same in the days ahead, should Mr Hancock choose to lie low.

Both Labour and the Lib Dems are calling for Mr Hancock to be sacked. Mr Johnson may not want to give them a scalp right now. But any further damaging details about the alleged affair could yet force his hand.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in