Student Loans Company used Wonga-style letters from fake legal firm to frighten graduates
The practice has been 'suspended' after nine years
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Student Loans Company (SLC) sent graduates letters under the name of a fake debt recovery firm to frighten them into paying up, it has emerged.
The tactic has been used since 2005 for people in arrears but came under scrutiny after payday lender Wonga was ordered to pay £2.6 million for using fictional law firms.
Wonga was ordered to compensate the 45,000 people who received letters from “Chainey, D’Amato and Shannon” and “Barker and Lowe Legal Recoveries”.
In the SLC’s case, the ruse was “Smith Lawson & Company”.
The letters read: “We are instructed by our client, in connection with the sum outstanding shown above.”
The Office for Fair Trading had already ordered the SLC to change the letters in March and a new format was developed removing the reference to a “client” and increasing the size of the footer saying Smith Lawson was part of the Government subsidiary.
In the House of Lords on Thursday, Liberal Democrat peer Lord Paddick asked what action the Government was taking over the “misleading practices”.
“The practice of companies sending threatening letters falsely representing themselves as debt collection agencies is something that we might expect of payday loan companies, but not of a government agency”, he added.
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon said only two Smith Lawson letters had been sent since the matter was brought to the Government’s attention on 27 June and Vince Cable was meeting with SLC officials.
Unlike Wonga, no charges were made for the letters, and Smith Lawson was registered properly as a trading name, he added.
Lord Phillips of Sunbury told the House talks with the SLC were not enough and called for the chairman, Christian Brodie, to resign.
“This is straightforward deceit,” he said.
“If any student were engaged in deceit of this nature he or she would be thrown out of their university or denied a job prospect. Surely we must start to set an example.”
A spokesman for the SLC said the use of Smith Lawson branded correspondence had been “suspended”.
He added: “The Smith Lawson collection process has been used since 2005 to support collection activities and was mainly used after the initial in-house collections process had been exhausted for customers who had persistently defaulted on their loan repayments and were in arrears for a minimum of three months.”
The SLC is chasing repayments from around 3.5 million people and reports to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments