Donald Trump publicly assails 'Mexican' judge presiding over Trump University fraud case

Donald Trump is at his most dangerous when he feels threatened

David Usborne
New York
Saturday 28 May 2016 15:09
Comments
Protestor at a Trump event
Protestor at a Trump event

Donald Trump has broken another convention of political behaviour, using a campaign rally in California to launch into the federal judge who is presiding over a civil case regarding his now defunct Trump University calling him “hostile”, “a total disgrace” - and a “Mexican”.

Judge Gonzalo Curiel, a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, should not only be removed from the case in question, Mr Trump insisted, but also should be investigated. What that investigation would be about, he didn’t specify. The judge’s chambers declined to respond.

The billionaire thus again showed off two character facets the country has seen before - a thin skin and a willingness to bully. It began with Mr Trump suddenly interrupting his own flow at a rally in San Diego - where Judge Curiel’s court is located - announcing his desire to talk about him for two minutes. Instead he plunged into an ad hominem rant that lasted nearly 12 minutes.

All this while outside the Convention Centre in San Diego on Friday evening, scores of protestors chanted angrily about the Republican presumptive nominee, accusing him of promoting hatred with his words and brandishing piñatas in his likeness, adorned variously with the nose of a pig and eyes in the form of dollar signs. Some were beaten back by baton-wielding police officers after trying to surge out of the protest pen they had been confined in.

There were similar scenes at a Trump rally in Albuquerque, New Mexico, on Tuesday when protesters, some waving giant Mexican flags, hurled burning T-shirts, plastic bottles and other items at police officers, injuring several. Police responded by firing pepper spray and smoke grenades into the crowd outside the Albuquerque Convention Center.

Mr Trump has denied having any role in encouraging anything beyond love and peace at is rallies blaming any scuffles and confrontations on the protestors. Yet critics who say he is precisely stoking tension and hatred, particularly against minorities in the United States, will point to the vitriol poured publicly over Judge Curiel on Friday as fresh evidence.

“When you are whipping people up, it contributes to an atmosphere that leads to the potential of political violence. Words matter,” commented Matt Dallak, a professor of political management in the Graduate School of Political Management at George Washington University.

There seemed to be many reasons why this particular judge might be a no-go in Mr Trump’s view, above all first his handling of the civil lawsuit against Trump University filed by students who paid $35,000 to learn to be world-beating estate agents and said they learned no such thing.

The fraud litigation is due to go to trial in Judge Curiel’s courtroom in late November just after the general election. Mr Trump’s lawyers said last month that their client, who may or may not be president by then, has agreed to testify.

“I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump, a hater. He’s a hater. His name is Gonzalo Curiel,” Mr. Trump told his supporters, inciting a chorus of boos against the absent judge.

“The judge was appointed by Barack Obama, federal judge. Frankly, he should recuse himself because he’s given us ruling after ruling after ruling, negative, negative, negative.”

“I think Judge Curiel should be ashamed of himself,” he barreled on. “Judges in this court system, federal court, they ought to look into Judge Curiel. Because what Judge Curiel is doing is a total disgrace, OK? But we’ll come back in November. Wouldn’t that be wild if I’m president and I come back to do a civil case? Where everybody likes it. OK. This is called life, folks.”

As if being promoted to the federal bench by the sitting president were not bad enough, Mr Trump derided his alleged ethnic background, getting himself into contortions about his relationship with Latinos - not good, whatever he says - while surely drawing a line in the minds of many of his supporters to the smear he made at the outset of his campaign nearly a year ago when he likened Mexican immigrants to “rapists” and “criminals” and vowed to build a wall to keep them out.

“I’ll be seeing you in November, either as president…” Mr Trump said, without quite finishing the thought.. “I think Judge Curiel should be ashamed of himself. I think it’s a disgrace that he’s doing this.” And then: “The judge, who happens to be, we believe, Mexican…I think the Mexicans are going to end up loving Donald Trump.”

Judge Curiel was born in East Chicago, Indiana.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in