Trump-Russia investigation: Paul Manafort charges leave President's 'fake news' defence exposed

The Donald's common claims about the probe haven't added up so far

Amber Phillips
Monday 30 October 2017 15:33 GMT

The independent investigation into Trump-Russia collusion just made its most serious move since it began in May. The Washington Post reported on Monday that Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and his former business partner, Rick Gates, have been ordered to surrender to federal authorities.

Both men are charged with 12 counts relating to financial crimes, including conspiracy against the United States, conspiracy to launder money and making false statements.

In other words, this Russia investigation is very real. Neither President Donald Trump nor the White House has commented on the indictments. But given that Trump has consistently claimed that this investigation is fake and a hoax, it's possible - even likely - he'll try to rebut this escalation of the investigation in similarly absolute terms. Over the weekend, as news organisations reported charges were coming, Trump fired off nearly half a dozen tweets trying to pivot to Hillary Clinton.

Trump-Russia investigation: who has been charged in the Mueller probe

Here are some of Trump's common claims about the investigation that haven't added up so far, especially now that there are charges.

Trump claim No. 1: There's no evidence of collusion

Trump's main argument here is that the FBI, in some form or another, has been looking into this for more than a year and because it hasn't come to a conclusion about collusion, there must be none. That assumes a lot of unknowns.

Besides, special counsel Rober Mueller's team has only been on the job since May. It has impanelled a federal grand jury and now is charging Trump's former campaign chairman. Those are both significant escalations in a five-month-old investigation.

Congress is also investigating alleged Russian meddling. Earlier this month, the top Senate Republican and Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee said that, after eight months of investigating, hundreds of hours of interviews with more than 100 people and nearly 100,000 pages of documents, they aren't ready to rule out collusion.

“We have more work to do as it relates to Russia collusion, but we're developing a clearer picture of what happened,” said Senator Richard Burr (Republican-North Carolina), chairman of the committee.

Translation: At the very least, accusations that the Trump campaign worked with Russia are not a hoax. It's worth significant time and resources for three committees in Congress and one independent investigation to continue to look into.

Claim No. 2: These charges have nothing to do with the Trump administration

Manafort and Gates are charged with something that does not seem directly related to Russia collusion. And so Trump and his allies could argue that this has nothing to do with them.

Except, this is likely the beginning of Mueller's investigation, not the end, said Jeffrey Jacobovitz, a white collar lawyer who has represented Clinton administration officials.

Many legal experts think Mueller is putting pressure on these outside figures to get them to cooperate by sharing what they know about Trump's inner circle. If true, that would explain the FBI knocking on Manafort's door in an aggressive pre-dawn raid, or the special counsel looking into Michael Flynn's son.

“Mueller wouldn't have hired 16, 17 people to investigate these events just to indict some tangential person unrelated to the campaign,” Jacobovitz said. “I think one of the things he's trying to do is trying to get Manafort to flip and cooperate” on the broader investigation.

Claim No. 3: Mueller and his team are politically motivated

Some of Trump's allies have tried to draw lines between the prosecutors Mueller has hired and their ties to Democrats. Since Mueller's team is operating behind closed doors, it's been hard to directly rebut that.

But that logic falls into a gaping hole with this indictment. Mueller has persuaded a federal judge to set up a grand jury, he has presented the evidence his team has found, and that independent grand jury decided to return an indictment.

“This is out of Mueller's hands,” Jacobovitz said. “It's an independent jury. They could have declined the indictment, but apparently they did not.”

“It's a first step and it could be one of many,” he said.

The Washington Post

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in