Donald Trump announcing imminent talks with Vladimir Putin ‘takes advisers by surprise’

'No one was planning on a meeting with Putin at this point, given all the questions about continuing Russian interference in our elections and the ongoing Mueller probe'

Karen Deyoung,John Hudson
Thursday 22 March 2018 14:16 GMT
Comments
Trump on Putin: 'We will probably get together in the not-too-distant future'

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas

Editor

President Donald Trump’s senior advisers were thrown when he told Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday that he expected to meet with him soon, as briefings before the call to Moscow included no mention of a possible meeting and aides have not been instructed to prepare for one, senior administration officials said.

Although Mr Trump told reporters that “probably, we’ll be seeing President Putin in the not-too-distant future,” several officials said there are no plans for the two even to be in the same country until November, when both are expected to attend a Group of 20 (G20) summit in Argentina.

Amid criticism by some lawmakers of his congratulatory call to Mr Putin, whose 76 per cent win in the Russian election on Sunday was denounced as a “sham” by Senate Armed Services Committee chairman John McCain, Mr Trump tweeted Wednesday that “getting along with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing” and said that Moscow could help the United States solve a range of international problems.

Referring to his immediate three predecessors in office, Mr Trump said that George W Bush didn’t have the “smarts” to get along with the Russians and that Barack Obama and Bill Clinton “didn’t have the energy or the chemistry”.

Mr Trump’s briefing materials for the Putin call, placed in a binder by the staff secretary’s office for Mr Trump’s review, did not include any reference to a meeting and specifically warned against congratulating the Russian President, said a person with direct knowledge who, like other officials, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal White House deliberations.

Senior White House officials have previously opposed a bilateral meeting with the Russian President.

Hours before the White House even acknowledged Mr Trump had spoken to Mr Putin, the Kremlin put its own spin on the call, saying that Mr Trump had called to congratulate Mr Putin and that “special attention was paid to making progress on the question of holding a possible meeting at the highest level”.

The Russian statement forced the hand of the White House, where advisers had disagreed on whether to include Mr Trump’s congratulations in the official US account, two people familiar with the conversation said. When the official White House readout of the call emerged several hours later, it said Mr Trump congratulated Mr Putin but made no mention of a discussion of a meeting.

For Mr Trump, such spur-of-the-moment remarks to foreign leaders are not unusual and often have had little lasting meaning, officials said, noting that he often issues invitations to a meal or a meeting.

The call to Mr Putin was the second time this month that Mr Trump has made an impromptu announcement that he planned to meet with a foreign leader, although his 8 March decision to hold talks with North Korea’s Kim Jong-Un appeared to carry more weight and has sparked a flurry of internal planning.

Both moves bore the hallmarks of an emboldened President who appears increasingly comfortable in disregarding the advice of his most senior advisers and facing off with the most implacable US foes, regardless of the potential risks.

“No one was planning on a meeting with Putin at this point, given all the questions about continuing Russian interference in our elections and the ongoing Mueller probe, never mind the ... poisoning” of a former Russian double-agent this month in Britain, said Angela Stent, a former national intelligence officer with a focus on Russia in the administration of President George W Bush. “This shows that Trump continues to believe that he can make a ‘deal’ with Putin and is unconstrained by his advisers who have been arguing for restraint and caution.”

Advocates of closer ties between the United States and Russia also defended Mr Trump’s decision to dictate his own meeting with the Russian leader, as well within his prerogative.

“The president is signalling that he is going to take centre spotlight as diplomat in chief,” said Matt Rojansky, a Russia scholar at the Wilson Center. “I can imagine he does not want to wait to be directed or handled by the bureaucracy on even these extremely difficult negotiations, because he has spent his adult life negotiating deals. It might mean he gets out ahead of his advisers, but their job is to catch up and they will.”

Although Mr Trump said early in his campaign that he and the Russian leader were good friends, he later acknowledged that he had never met Mr Putin. The two Presidents subsequently sat down together at last summer’s G20 meeting in Germany and at an Asia-Pacific economic summit in November.

One senior US official attributed Mr Trump’s resistance to guidance that he should distance himself from Mr Putin to the President’s belief that he should not have to forfeit his pursuit of better relations with Moscow to a Russia investigation at home that he thinks is illegitimate.

In an interview with NBC this month, Mr Putin aligned himself with Mr Trump’s stated belief that good relations with Russia are a priority. Asked why Mr Trump was “always so nice to you,” Mr Putin said that “this is not about being nice to me personally, in my view. I think he is an experienced person, a businessman with very extensive experience and he understands that if you need to partner with someone, you must treat your future or current partner with respect, otherwise nothing will come of it. I think this is a purely pragmatic approach.”

Some administration officials defended Mr Trump’s personal approach to Mr Putin, noting that what he said was often different from what he did, such as imposing new sanctions this month against Russia and his decision to send lethal US weapons to Ukraine to aid the country’s fight against Russian-backed separatists, something that Mr Obama had declined to do.

In his tweets Wednesday, Mr Trump said Russia could “help solve problems with North Korea, Syria, Ukraine, Isis, Iran and even the coming Arms Race.” In Syria and Ukraine, the United States has been harshly critical of Russian actions – to little avail – and has charged that Russia’s ongoing support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has made the final defeat of Isis more difficult.

Moscow also continues a close relationship with Tehran and the United States has accused Russia of helping North Korea evade sanctions.

Seeking to deflect criticism of Mr Trump’s call to Mr Putin, the White House issued a statement Wednesday noting that Obama, too, had called Mr Putin to congratulate him on a previous electoral victory.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel also congratulated Mr Putin this week.

Britain has accused Russia of responsibility for the recent nerve agent attack in Britain on former Russian spy Sergei Skripal, who served as a double-agent for Britain before settling there. British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson on Wednesday compared Mr Putin’s promotion of this summer’s World Cup soccer tournament in Russia to Adolf Hitler’s use of the 1936 Berlin Olympics for propaganda purposes.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that the Skripal poisoning, about which Mr Trump signed a letter – along with his counterparts in Britain, Germany and France – blaming Russia did not come up during the phone call with Mr Putin.

But after a call on Wednesday with French President Emmanuel Macron, the White House issued a statement saying, “The Presidents reiterated their solidarity with the United Kingdom in the wake of Russia’s use of chemical weapons against private citizens on British soil and agreed on the need to take action to hold Russia accountable”.

The Washington Post

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in