Study finds Medicare for All could have prevented more than 200,000 deaths during the pandemic

The US has had more deaths per capita than its economic peers – and according to one study, it’s no mystery why

Abe Asher
Thursday 16 June 2022 22:56
Comments
Anthony Fauci Tests Positive for COVID

A new study published this month in the journal PNAS claims that the US could have saved at least 212,000 lives lost to Covid-19 in 2020 alone if it had a single-payer healthcare system.

The report lambastes the shortcomings in the US’ for-profit healthcare system, arguing that multiple factors in a single-payer system would have reduced fatalities in the first year of the pandemic. Since the onset of the pandemic, the US has had more deaths per capita than its economic peers. It also has had the most recorded total deaths and cases in the world.

The US’ healthcare system, which does not guarantee coverage and leaves millions of people without health insurance, has long been criticised. The US currently spends more money per capita on healthcare than its economic peers, but does not enjoy better health outcomes on average; life expectency in the US, which is declining, is the lowest among OECD countries.

Now, researchers are pinning the country’s struggle to contain the worst outcomes of Covid on the healthcare system as well.

The new study holds that under a single-payer healthcare plan like the one championed by Sen Bernie Sanders of Vermont and other progressives, no one in the US would have lost their health insurance when much of the economy shut down in March of 2020. Instead, millions of people lost their employer-based health insurance. 

The researchers also believe that rates of vaccination in the country would be higher if more Americans had an ongoing relationship with a primary care physician – which one in four Americans lack – and that those factors would have decreased the Covid-induced strain on US hospitals that also is believed to have cost lives during Covid surges.

A number of the other countries in the OECD that have fared better than the US with Covid fatalities do not have single-payer healthcare systems, but all guarantee healthcare coverage regardless of employment status.

There may have been other factors that harmed the US’ Covid response as well, including racism, President Donald Trump’s Covid denalism that has been echoed by influential members of the conservative and far-right movements throughout the country, and deep, pre-existing cultural divides.

The country’s handling of the pandemic has deeply dented the trust of both patients and physicians in the US healthcare system, with one in three Americans overall reporting that their trust in the country’s health system has declined since the onset of Covid.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in