NRA sues San Francisco after being officially branded ‘terrorist organisation’
Gun group vows to 'fight for constitutional freedoms' as legal challenge mounted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The National Rifle Association (NRA) has sued San Francisco, claiming city officials' declaration that the group is a "terrorist organisation" and thus business with them should be kept to a minimum, effectively constituted a blacklist.
The NRA, a gun club and gun rights lobbying group with deep political influence, alleged in the suit on Monday that the declaration by the city's Board of Supervisors violated free speech rights for political goals.
The confrontation follows heightened debate in the United States following a spate of mass shootings, including one last month at an El Paso Walmart in which 22 people were killed and about 24 wounded in the city near the US-Mexico border.
"This lawsuit comes with a message to those who attack the NRA: We will never stop fighting for our law-abiding members and their constitutional freedoms," Wayne LaPierre, the group's chief executive officer, said in a statement.
The resolution declares: "The National Rifle Association is a domestic terrorist organisation' whose advocacy is a direct cause of arming "individuals who would and have committed acts of terrorism".
Supervisor Catherine Stefani of the San Francisco board was confident the measure to limit city and county officials working with companies doing business with the NRA would stand up in court, according to the New York Times.
"It's a resolution, it's not an ordinance, it's non-binding," she told the newspaper.
It requires government officials to "assess the financial and contractual relationships with our vendors and contractors have with [the NRA]," and to "take every reasonable step to limit those entities who do business with the City and County of San Francisco."
It does not go into effect unless signed by San Francisco Mayor London Breed.
The suit asks the court to "instruct elected officials that freedom of speech means you cannot silence or punish those with whom you disagree."
"The Resolution does not try to hide it animus towards the NRA's political speech, nor its animating purpose: to remove the NRA from the gun control debate," said the suit, filed on Monday in the District Court for the Northern District of California.
Reuters
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments