Coronavirus: Nurse with symptoms hits out at CDC for refusing to test her

Anonymous letter distributed by union describes multiple pretexts given for not testing healthcare worker

Coronavirus – Will a facemask help?

A California nurse who complained of symptoms consistent with coronavirus has hit out at the Centres for Disease Control (CDC) for allegedly failing to test them and other nurses.

In an anonymous letter distributed by National Nurses United, the nurse describes how after volunteering to be on the care team for a patient who had tested positive for the virus, they themselves started to develop symptoms.

After being put on a 14-day self-quarantine, their doctor ordered a coronavirus test.

However, they allege, the CDC then refused to initiate testing on the basis that “if I were wearing the recommended protective equipment, then I wouldn’t have the coronavirus.

“What kind of science-based answer is that? What a ridiculous and uneducated response from the department that is in charge of our health in this country.”

The nurse says the agency then called back and told them that the CDC “prioritise running samples by illness severity and that there are only so many to give out each day. So I have to wait in line to find out the results.”

She found this outrageous. “This is not the ticket dispenser at the deli counter; it’s a public health emergency! I am a registered nurse, and I need to know if I am positive before going back to caring for patients.”

The nurse goes on to stress that this is not an individual story. “I am appalled at the level of bureaucracy that’s preventing nurses from getting tested. That is a health care decision my doctor and my county health department agree with. Delaying this test puts the whole community at risk.

“I have the backing of my union. Nurses aren’t going to stand by and let this testing delay continue; we are going to stand together to make sure we can protect our patients—by being protected ourselves.”

The CDC told The Hill that while it would not comment on the individual case, it would “most definitely recommend” that a health worker who had come into contact with a coronavirus patient be tested, and that “Our clinical team working with state and local health departments to assess Persons Under investigation has not said no to any request for testing”.

The writer of the letter is a nurse at a California Kaiser facility in the north of the state, which declared a state of emergency after confirming the US’s first coronavirus death outside of Washington state.

The authorities are trying to trace passengers who disembarked from a cruise ship, the Grand Princess, on which several thousand people are thought to have been exposed. The ship has been held near the coast of San Francisco.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in