Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Trump won election because Democrats rigged system to have Clinton beat Bernie Sanders, says WikiLeaks

Leaked emails show that people at the top of the Democrat Party appeared to be helping Ms Clinton at the expense of her rivals

Andrew Griffin
Wednesday 09 November 2016 21:47 GMT
Comments
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (L) and U.S. Sen Bernie Sanders (I-VT) greet supporters during a campaign rally at Coastal Credit Union Music Park at Walnut Creek on November 3, 2016 in Raleigh, North Carolina
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (L) and U.S. Sen Bernie Sanders (I-VT) greet supporters during a campaign rally at Coastal Credit Union Music Park at Walnut Creek on November 3, 2016 in Raleigh, North Carolina (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Bernie Sanders could have won the presidential election but the Democrats stopped him from doing so, WikiLeaks has suggested.

The whistleblowing agency has claimed that the Democrat leadership conspired to make sure that Hillary Clinton won the primary and became the party's candidate. In doing so it picked a weaker leader and in so doing lost the election, WikiLeaks has suggested.

The suggestion follows the same one made by others, that Bernie Sanders would have been able to more easily take on the Trump campaign and potentially win the election.

WikiLeaks' discussion of "biasing its internal electoral market" appears to be a reference to the allegations that people at the top of the Democrat party backed Ms Clinton in the primaries, and so helped her go on to win the nomination. It was leaked emails from WikiLeaks that led to party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigning in July, after being forced to step aside because of the emails.

Bernie Sanders was right that he was the only one to beat Trump

The embarrassing cache of messages showed that Ms Wasserman Schultz and other officials appeared to be leading co-ordinated efforts to have Ms Clinton elected. She stepped down after the site published those messages and it became clear that the process may not have been as open and fair as had been claimed.

By helping Ms Clinton to win, the party "defeated the purpose of running a primary", suggested the WikiLeaks account – which is thought to be run by Julian Assange.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in