Donald Trump’s new Twitter-like social network appears to be an unacknowledged clone of someone else’s work, and the original creator is considering legal action.
Although Mastodon is open source and can be freely copied by anyone, its software licence requires imitators to make their own source code available and give credit to the original.
Screenshots taken from a leaked early version of Truth Social showed that it still contained pieces of HTML code from Mastodon, and Mr Rochko said that Truth uses Mastodon’s default error message, indicating that it is almost certainly a clone.
“Well, that looks familiar,” the official Mastodon account tweeted on Wednesday evening.
Mr Rochko said: “We pride ourselves on providing software that allows anyone to run their own social media platform independent of Big Tech.
“But the condition upon which we release our work for free in the first place is that as we give to the platform operators, so do the platform operators give back to us by providing their improvements for us and everyone to see.
“That doesn't only benefit us as the developers – it benefits the people that use these platforms, as it gives them insight into the functionality of the platforms that manage their data and gives them the ability to walk away and start their own.
“So as you can see, compliance is very important to us. I have notified my legal counsel to review the given situation. At the moment I cannot comment any further.”
Truth Social has been asked for comment.
Mr Trump’s team announced their new venture with great fanfare on Wednesday, describing it as a future “media powerhouse” with a “non-woke” online streaming service that will compete with Netflix, Disney+ and Hulu.
Within hours, however, hackers had uncovered a live beat version, and social media users were able to hijack valuable usernames such as donaldtrump, donaldjtrump and mikepence.
Mastodon is a free piece of software that can be used to create and run new social networks, designed to escape the centralised rule of Big Tech services such as Facebook and Twitter.
In 2017, Mr Rochko argued that smaller social networks set up by like-minded groups of people would be “less prone to harbouring toxic” behaviour than all-encompassing tech platforms designed to house everyone.
Register for free to continue reading
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
Already have an account? sign in
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies