Lawyer explains why Michael Flynn's immunity request changes everything

'Flynn's immunity request very strongly suggests there was a criminal conspiracy at the highest levels of government'

Niamh McIntyre@niamh_mcintyre
Saturday 01 April 2017 16:32
0 comments
Former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and US President Donald Trump
Former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and US President Donald Trump

Michael Flynn’s unusual immunity request suggests the Trump administration has been involved in a "criminal conspiracy", according to a US legal commentator.

The former national security adviser, who was forced to step down for failing to disclose the extent of his meetings with Russian diplomats, has agreed to co-operate with investigations into links between Russia and the Trump administration.

Mr Flynn will testify for the Senate and House Intelligence Committees’ investigation into Russia links and alleged interference in the 2016 election - but only if he is granted immunity from prosecution.

“General Flynn certainly has a story to tell, and he very much wants to tell it”, said his lawyer in a statement released Thursday.

Seth Abramson, a former attorney turned academic and journalist, said that a number of aspects of Mr Flynn’s request were “bizarre”.

Immunity is generally granted in secret deals between attorneys and investigators, so it it is unusual Mr Flynn’s lawyers have made their request so publicly.

“If he really had some very specific information about Trump campaign collusion with the Russians ... there’s no way a lawyer would try to sell that information for immunity by way of release of a statement,” law professor Ronald Wright told Vox.

Mr Abramson went on to speculate that the very public nature of the statement could mean that Flynn had agreed to give evidence which would incriminate Mr Trump or a large number of his associates - “delivering a bigger fish” or a “huge number of smaller ones.”

“Another possibility is that Flynn might fear for his life”, said the attorney. “Flynn so publicly implying he has the goods on Russiagate greatly increases the risk of discovery for anyone trying to silence him.”

“Let's be clear: Flynn's immunity request very strongly suggests there was a criminal conspiracy at the highest levels of government.”

He also speculated the former security adviser might be scrambling to be first in an “immunity race”, as a number of other high-profile Republicans and Trump associates might also be implicated in the Russia investigation.

Michael Flynn once said anyone seeking immunity 'probably committed a crime'

However, NBC reported on Friday that the Senate Intelligence Committee had rejected the immunity request. A senior Congressional officially said immunity was “wildly preliminary” and “not on the table” at this point.

It does not necessarily rule out immunity being granted at a later date.

Mr Flynn was criticised after an interview emerged in which he said: “When you are given immunity, that means that you have probably committed a crime,”

Comments

Share your thoughts and debate the big issues

Learn more

Delete Comment

Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

Report Comment

Are you sure you want to mark this comment as inappropriate?

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts