McConnell reportedly asks GOP senators to vote against Capitol riot commission as ‘personal favor’

Senate Republicans likely to block bipartisan commission to investigate assault

Alex Woodward
New York
Thursday 27 May 2021 21:59
Sen. Chuck Schumer slams 'bananas-crazy' theory about bamboo in ballots
Leer en Español

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has reportedly asked certain Republicans who would be likely to support the formation of a bipartisan commission to investigate the circumstances and aftermath of the Capitol insurrection to vote against the proposal “as a personal favour” to him.

CNN’s Jamie Gangel said Republican lawmakers were “really caught by surprise” by Mr McConnell’s language ahead of a critical vote on a measure to create the commission, with one source calling it “despicable”, according to Ms Gangel.

His objections follow last week’s passage of the measure, with 35 Republicans defying House Republican leadership to support a resolution written with bipartisan support. The measure is unlikely to meet the 60-vote threshold in an evenly divided Senate.

House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy announced his opposition to the commission on 18 May. That night, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise said he would whip his GOP colleagues against it.

Mr McConnell announced he was “undecided” on a vote that night.

Following Donald Trump’s acquittal in the Senate in his second impeachment trial over inciting the assault, fuelled by a false “stolen election” narrative that sought to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election as members of Congress convened to certify them, Mr McConnell said unequivocally that “there’s no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking” the riot.

Despite voting against convicting him, Mr McConnell said the riot followed a “growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories and reckless hyperbole which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth”.

But on 18 May, the former president issued a statement raging against the commission proposal, pushing Republicans to “get much tougher” and echoing the deflection among GOP lawmakers to instead investigate “murders, riots and fire bombings” in cities run by Democrats.

“Hopefully, Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy are listening!” he said.

The following morning, Senator McConnell announced his opposition to what he called a “slanted and unbalanced proposal” from House Democrats.

“It’s not at all clear what new facts or additional investigation yet another commission could lay on top of the existing efforts by law enforcement and Congress,” he said on the Senate floor.

On Thursday, Mr McConnell claimed that he did not believe the commission would uncover any “new facts” or “promote healing” though there remains an opaque timeline of events and no clear understanding of what the administration, lawmakers or law enforcement knew, four months after the assault.

“I do not believe the additional, extraneous commission that Democratic leaders want would uncover crucial new facts, or promote healing,” he said. “Frankly, I do not believe it is even designed to do that.”

Democratic Senator Joe Manchin – who has objected to calls to nuke the filibuster that Republicans are likely to invoke to block the commission – slammed Mr McConnell for leading efforts to obstruct a vote.

“There is no excuse for any Republican to vote against this commission since Democrats have agreed to everything they asked for,” he said in a statement on Thursday.

“Mitch McConnell has made this his political position, thinking it will help his 2022 election,” Mr Manchin added. “They do not believe the truth will set you free, so they continue to live in fear.”

Mr McConnell’s office did not return The Independent’s request for comment.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in