McConnell bombarded with criticism over voting rights stance after posting Martin Luther King Day tribute

Martin Luther King Jr would be ‘rolling over in his grave’ at McConnell’s ‘hypocrisy’

Bevan Hurley
Monday 17 January 2022 15:04
Comments
<p>Mitch McConnell </p>

Mitch McConnell

Mitch McConnell has been been branded a hypocrite for posting a tribute to Martin Luther King Jr while leading Republican efforts to obstruct new voting-rights legislation.

Mr McConnell was among several Republicans who took to social media to praise the late civil rights icon as the country marked Martin Luther King Day.

“Nearly 60 years since the March on Washington, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s message echoes as powerfully as it did that day,” the Senate minority leader wrote on social media.

“His legacy inspires us to celebrate and keep building upon the remarkable progress our great nation has made toward becoming a more perfect union.”

Dr King’s eldest son Martin Luther King III, who is leading a protest march in Washington on Monday, said he would “not accept empty promises in pursuit of my father’s dream”.

He earlier criticised elected officials from both parties for tweeting about his father “while standing in the way of voting rights”, and called on filibuster reform to allow new voting laws to be passed.

Attempts to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act which would restore protections against voter discrimination have stalled in the Senate, where Republicans such as Ted Cruz have vowed to block its passage.

Twitter users said Dr King would be “rolling over in his grave” at Mr McConnell’s “hypocrisy”.

“Read the room. It was guys like you he was protesting against,” one person wrote.

Another said: “Keep MLK’s name out of your mouth since you and your party have done more to obstruct his dream from coming to pass than any other source.”

“You’ve spent your entire life undoing his work,” another person wrote.

Several states have introduced “waves of voting restrictions” that target communities of colour since the 2020 presidential elections, according to The Brennan Center for Justice.

This came after the Supreme Court “gutted” the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in 2013 by ending federal oversight of elections in states with a history of discriminatory practises.

President Joe Biden last week said he was in favour of reforming the filibuster so that voting legislation could pass without a super majority of 60 votes in the Senate.

However, Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema have rejected any attempts to change the filibuster.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in