Trump’s own impeachment lawyer ‘called him a f***ing crook’

His attorney had previously sued Trump in run-up to 2020 presidential election, accusing him of making claims about fraud with 'no evidence'

Trump attorney says defense team changed opening strategy

Leer en Español

Michael T van der Veen, one of the three attorneys representing Donald Trump in his Senate impeachment trial, once reportedly described the former president as a "f***ing crook" as he represented another client.

The Philadelphia lawyer also worked for a client who sued Mr Trump in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election for making voter fraud claims “despite having no evidence”. And in August 2020, a marketing email from van der Veen’s law firm had castigated Mr Trump’s attempts to suppress mail-in votes. 

It was in 2019 when Mr van der Veen made crude remarks while representing Justin Hiemstra, a student at the time, Mr Hiemstra told the Philadelphia Inquirer

Mr Hiemstra was accused of attempting to hack into a government database to obtain Mr Trump’s tax returns. “I’m not sure if [those comments] were made to make me feel more comfortable, or if they were his actual opinions,” he told the paper. “He definitely came off as fairly anti-Trump in the context that I knew him.”

Mr Hiemstra pleaded guilty and was sentenced to two years of probation.

In the same report, the Inquirer published a screenshot of a marketing email from Mr van der Veen's firm from August 2020, which said that "Donald Trump doesn't want you to be able to vote". The firm was writing about the decision to file a suit against the US Postal Service "to force it to deliver ballots" for the presidential election.

Mr van der Veen went on to sue Mr Trump, the US Postal Service and Postmaster General Louis DeJoy on behalf of independent candidate Melvin Johnakin, accusing Mr Trump of making repeated claims that "voting by mail is ripe with fraud, despite having no evidence" to support it. In the suit, the plaintiff sought "to preserve and protect the essential right to vote and prevent large-scale disenfranchisement."

The lawsuit was later settled in November, as a part of a broader effort to stop the Postal Service from making changes that could delay the mail delivery service, reported the Washington Post.

Speaking to his local paper about his previously reported positions on the former president, Mr van der Veen said his decision to join Mr Trump's defence team had nothing to with his personal views about him, and that he is approaching it like any other case.

“I have a client who is in need of and who deserves the best representation he can get, and that’s what we’re giving," Mr van der Veen was quoted as saying by the paper.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in