Manchester City face potential Arsenal tie in FA Cup fourth round
The holders Liverpool must get past Wolves in a third round replay with a trip to Brighton on the cards
![](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/yqLloAke/poster.jpg?width=720)
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
![Louise Thomas](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/louise-thomas.png)
Louise Thomas
Editor
Manchester City will play the winner of Premier League leaders Arsenal’s tie with Oxford in the FA Cup fourth round.
The Gunners take on the League One U’s on Monday evening with Pep Guardiola’s side awaiting the victor after they thumped Chelsea 4-0 in their third-round tie on Sunday.
Tottenham will travel to Preston, while holders Liverpool, who escaped with a replay against Wolves on Saturday, face an away trip to Brighton should they prevail at Molineux.
League Two’s Walsall will play the 2021 winners Leicester, while another fourth-tier side Stevenage’s reward for stunning Aston Villa on Sunday is a trip to Championship Stoke.
FA Cup 2023 fourth road draw
Ties to be played 27-30 January
Preston v Tottenham
Southampton v Blackpool
Wrexham v Sheffield United
Ipswich v Burnley
Manchester United v Reading
Luton or Wigan v Grimsby
Derby v West Ham
Stoke v Stevenage
Blackburn v Forest Green or Birmingham
Walsall v Leicester
Sheffield Wednesday v Fleetwood
Manchester City v Oxford or Arsenal
Bristol City or Swansea v Chesterfield or West Brom
Brighton v Liverpool or Wolves
Fulham v Sunderland
Boreham Wood or Accrington v Cardiff or Leeds
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments