Fifa presidential election: No see-through booths in battle for transparency

Governing body rejects additional measure demanded by candidate Prince Ali ahead of vote

Brian Homewood
Saturday 20 February 2016 22:41 GMT
Under Fifa’s statutes, voting is carried out secretly
Under Fifa’s statutes, voting is carried out secretly (Getty)

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas


Fifa have rejected a demand from a presidential candidate to use transparent voting booths at Friday’s presidential election to ensure delegates do not photograph their ballot papers.

The request came from Prince Ali Bin Al Hussein, who said he would take his case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, sport’s highest tribunal. The Jordanian candidate wanted to “safeguard the full transparency of the electoral proceedings”, he said through his lawyer.

Fifa’s 209 national associations each hold one vote and Prince Ali is among five candidates standing to replace the outgoing president, Sepp Blatter, who is banned for eight years amid a scandal that has shaken football’s governing body. Under Fifa’s statutes, voting is secret.

The statement said Domenico Scala, head of Fifa’s electoral committee, had admitted to Prince Ali in correspondence that members could produce evidence of their vote by using a mobile phone. But Scala rejected transparent booths and said members will be reminded that voting is secret and told to hand over mobile phones and cameras. Voting papers will only be issued inside the booths.

Prince Ali fears reprisals over votes
Prince Ali fears reprisals over votes (AFP/Getty)

“He [Scala] has said it is enough just to tell them they must not do so, and has rejected Prince Ali’s request to use transparent voting booths,” the statement said, adding that there was an “absence of any dedicated system to detect potential violations of this rule”.

Jérôme Champagne, another candidate, has said some members were asked to provide evidence of their vote. Four of the six continental associations have nominated their preferred candidates. Members ignore these at their peril.

As Prince Ali has pointed out, those who disobey can face reprisals. “Development projects mysteriously stall, tournament hosting bids are suddenly compromised or withdrawn, national teams face less favourable fixtures or even referees. All these are effective ways to punish member associations that fail to demonstrate loyalty,” he said.


Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in