Grand National betting 2014: Should I bet on a two and a half mile specialist?

We try to narrow down the betting options ahead of Saturday's race

Sean Trivass
Tuesday 01 April 2014 10:30

“It takes a two and a half mile specialist to win the National”.

This concept never ceases to amaze me, yet you will hear it in in the betting shops and read it on line and in various less exalted publications. Looking at the nice simple facts to start with, the Grand National is a handicap chase over four miles three furlongs and 110 yards – in my mind there is no logical reason why horses who specialise at shorter races should have any advantage here, but we shall see.

Starting with the race last year, all bar one of the seventeen finishers had won over three miles or more (most of them even further) prior to the race, with the exception of Quiscover Fontaine who was beaten 92 lengths in sixteenth place, and he is hardly a brilliant endorsement for the theory!

Past winners going back as far as 1989 have ALL won over at least three miles under rules (not point-to-points) prior to writing their names in to racing history here, with further distance very much deemed an advantage with twenty-one of the twenty-four adding at least a furlong to the obligatory three miles, and in many cases quite a few furlongs more!    

So, what does that tell us about the race in 2014 – do we now have any clues to reduce the field further based on these stats, and try to pinpoint a sensible short list of possible winners? Assuming we carry on with the short list created yesterday (less the latest non runners), we can use this pretty concrete looking statistic to knock out another NINE runners (current prices in brackets), in the shape of Hunt Ball (40/1), Walkon (50/1), Buckers Bridge (50/1), Last Time D’Albain (40/1), Out Now (50/1), Quiscover Fontaine (66/1), Sir Du Bearn (100/1), Solix (66/1), and Sergeant Pink (100/1) – leaving us with a new look list reduced to “just” 41 possibilities from a starting list of 73 – almost half way there now, and tomorrow we get to look at the weights to see if we can knock a few more out – see you then!

Should I factor in the age and experience of the horse?

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in