Trump administration comes under unprecedented criticism from British spies calling claims 'utterly ridiculous'

'They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored'

Andrew Griffin
Friday 17 March 2017 11:57
Comments
Picture:
Picture:

GCHQ's public criticism of the Trump administration might be unprecedented in the history of intelligence agencies.

The British spying organisation has come out to deny claims that it helped Barack Obama spy on Donald Trump, calling the claims "utterly ridiculous".

The statement is in contrast with years of protocol that has meant GCHQ has commented on any stories, let alone criticising its closest ally. The agency has almost always committed never to comment on any intelligence matter, and doing so is a major and meaningful break with its previous behaviour.

“Recent allegations made by media commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano about GCHQ being asked to conduct ‘wire tapping’ against the then-president-elect are nonsense,” a spokesperson said in a statement. “They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored.”

GCHQ initially refused to comment on the claims that it had helped spy on Trump Tower, when they were made by a Fox News analyst, as it always has. But they were then repeated by Donald Trump's spokesman, Sean Spicer, straining relationships between the US and the UK.

Mr Spicer said that Mr Obama had asked for the UK intelligence agencies' help because it would mean that he could listen in on Mr Trump's conversations without getting "fingerprints" on them.

The two countries' intelligence agencies are so closely aligned that if one of them went offline or was attacked, it would pass all of its work onto the other, it has been said. There is huge levels of sharing between the two groups, meaning that they wouldn't even be able to work on their own – they use each others' code, staff and facilities throughout the world.

Now GCHQ has taken the perhaps unprecedented step of criticising the US president and apparently complicating that relationship.

As well as its official statement, GCHQ's communications director Andrew Pike has further criticised Mr Trump.

He called the claims "a very unusual allegation" in a tweet that was sent Eric King, a privacy campaigner. He responded to another tweet by an anti-Trump campaigner who wrote "Mr Pike please know the majority of us are against the allegations, deeply respect you & your colleagues, and will always stand with you," writing "Thank you".

The posts were the first time that the relatively light tweeter has sent a direct message to anyone.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in