Hotelier's business collapses after 'good' reviews on website

The hotel has suffered a downturn in bookings after it was 'redflagged' by TripAdvisor following 'suspicious' good reviews

Kevin Rawlinson
Friday 30 September 2011 00:00
Comments

A hotelier's business has seen a "catastrophic collapse in bookings" after her customers wrote online TripAdvisor reviews which were too positive, it has been claimed.

The Riverside Hotel & Restaurant's page on TripAdvisor was "red-flagged" because the site believed hotel staff had tampered with reviews. But the manager of the establishment in Evesham, Worcestershire, has insisted it was all a misunderstanding and that one particularly positive review, posted by a customer using the hotel's WiFi network, is behind the whole affair.

Deborah Sinclair, 45, said she believed the customer, who had stayed for around four weeks after his home was flooded, had written the review while he was still in the hotel. "He brought us flowers and told us he had loved his stay and that he had written to TripAdvisor about us," she said.

"The irony is that I was ranked number one in the area before all of this. We have had to drop the prices from £125 per night on average to around £40 just to fill the rooms – we used to turn people away. I normally cater for the high end of the market, people who spend £40 a night are less likely to spend a lot of money in the bar and restaurant."

Good reviews on websites like Trip-Advisor can drive hordes of holidaymakers to a hotel, while bad ones can keep them away. The site has started scanning for reviews sent from IP addresses matching a hotels to stop fraudulent reviews. When suspicions were raised about the Riverside Hotel's profile, a notice was placed warning users.

"When it went up, the phone stopped ringing. I guarantee 100 per cent I've not written anything about my hotel on there," said Ms Sinclair, who plans to sue the site.

A TripAdvisor spokesman said: "The investigation revealed representatives of the property were engaging in fraudulent activity and a badge was applied. If an owner feels it has been unfairly applied, we urge them to contact us."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in