Foreign secretary Liz Truss flew by private jet to Australia at a cost of over half a million pounds to the taxpayer, rather than using scheduled flights that would have been faster and far cheaper.
Instead of travelling from London to Sydney on one of the daily Qantas departures, Ms Truss flew the 22,000 miles to, from and within Australia aboard the private government Airbus A321.
The Ministerial Code makes clear that only the foreign secretary could authorise such a flight.
The aircraft type holds 235 passengers on easyJet flights, but the government’s version is kitted out with a VIP interior – including lie-flat beds.
The mission to Australia and back this week burnt an estimated 150 tonnes of fuel and generated nearly 500 tonnes of CO2.
Scheduled flights were available for the same itinerary, but it is understood the private flight was chosen for “security considerations” amid fears that conversations could be overheard by other passengers.
A leading environmental campaigner has described the foreign secretary’s choice as “an outrageous source of emissions in the current climate emergency”.
Ms Truss began her journey on at noon on 18 January with a flight from London Stansted to Dubai. It took off two hours after the regular Qantas departure from Heathrow, which went nonstop to Darwin in Australia’s Northern Territory and continued to Sydney.
After a 90-minute refuelling stop in the UAE, the foreign secretary’s plane flew overnight to Kuala Lumpur, where it took on more fuel.
Flight XT645, as it was coded, touched down at Sydney shortly after midnight on 20 January – five hours behind the Qantas scheduled flight from London.
The plane sat on the ground at Sydney for two days while the foreign secretary met Australia government officials, before flying across to Adelaide where Ms Truss gave a speech.
Her private flight on 22 January followed a Qantas domestic service, QF733, which departed on exactly the same route just 17 minutes earlier.
Data recorded by Flightradar24 shows the foreign secretary’s Airbus left Adelaide at 10.50pm the same day. It refuelled at both Kuala Lumpur and Dubai before arriving back at Stansted airport at 1.20pm on 23 January.
The commercial alternative was a domestic flight the same evening from Adelaide to Darwin, connecting with the Qantas nonstop to Heathrow – arriving nine hours before the government aircraft.
A senior source from the aviation charter industry told The Independent that the cost of operating Ms Truss’s trip would have been “at least £500k”.
The most expensive business-class ticket for the foreign secretary’s entire itinerary on Qantas, which offers lie-flat beds on board the Boeing 787, would have been £7,712.
The Foreign Office said a total of 14 people took the flight, including Ms Truss, her officials and security detail. At least two sets of flight crew were required for the trip.
Labour's deputy leader, Angela Rayner, said the use of the private jet showed “the public exactly quite how little respect this Conservative government has for taxpayers’ money”.
She said: “It is obscene that government ministers are jet-setting yet are hiking taxes and refusing to do anything to help working families when they are feeling the pinch of the cost of living crisis.
“Tories waste disgusting amounts of public money on their own vanity and comfort, Labour wants to see families see a cut to energy bills, that is the difference.”
SNP environment spokesperson Deidre Brock added that it was a “grotesque misuse of taxpayers’ money to fund her jet-set lifestyle” and said that “with a record like this, Lavish Liz will make a fitting successor to Boris Johnson”.
Anna Hughes, director of the environmental charity Flight Free UK, said: “Liz Truss has consistently demonstrated her lack of understanding about the action that we all need to take to address the climate crisis, and this is no exception.
“Flying to Australia and back on a chartered jet is shockingly privileged and an outrageous source of emissions in the current climate emergency.”
Responding to the criticism, Ms Truss said: “I used the government plane - that is why we have a government plane: to enable government ministers to conduct government business, and that’s what I flew to Australia in.”
Asked whether she deemed its deployment a “good use” of public money, she replied: “We have a government plane precisely so that government ministers can travel.
“Every government decision is based on value for money. We have a government plane specifically so ministers, like me in my role as foreign secretary, can go and do the work overseas which is ultimately delivering for the British people.”
The cabinet minister said: “Unless we honour the promises made, to turn the commitments in the Glasgow Climate Pact into action, they will wither on the vine.”
Mr Sharma described the Cop26 agreement as “a practical demonstration of Global Britain in action”.
A Foreign Office spokesperson said: “It’s necessary for the foreign secretary to travel abroad to pursue UK interests around security, trade and technology, as she did during this visit to Australia.
“This trip used government transport and was fully within rules set out in the Ministerial Code.”
The plane used by the foreign secretary is an 18-month-old Airbus A321neo operated for the government by the Stansted-based airline Titan Airways.
It was delivered new from the Airbus factory at Hamburg on 26 October 2020.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies