<p>A Southwest Boeing 737 lands at Los Angeles International Airport</p>

A Southwest Boeing 737 lands at Los Angeles International Airport

Woman sues Southwest for $10 million for kicking her off flight after she removed mask ‘to drink water’

Passenger says she needed to drink water frequently due to heart condition and low blood sugar

Lucy Thackray
Wednesday 19 January 2022 15:34

A US-based woman is suing Southwest Airlines for $10m after she was ejected from one of the airline’s flights for not complying with mask rules.

Florida-based Medora Clai Reading, 68, alleges that she was wrongly kicked off her flight on 7 January 2021 for not wearing a mask - saying that she only removed her mask to periodically drink water.

In a case filed on Wednesday, Reading claimed that she needed to stay hydrated for medical reasons, including a heart condition and low blood sugar, but a “hostile” flight attendant kept demanding that she keep her mask on.

She also claims she offered to show the crew member her medical exemption card but was told, “We don’t care”.

Reading claims she was ordered off the flight as an unmasked pilot “laughed mockingly” at her.

After disembarking, she alleges that airport police who helped her said that these evictions from flights were “happening far too often”, saying “it is usually Southwest.”

Her attorney, Kristina Heuser, claims a “planeload full of witnesses” saw the incident, with some videoing it.

The lawyer accused Southwest of “hostile and abusive” conduct and “Covid insanity”.

End-of-year data from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) shows that 5,981 unruly passenger incidents were reported by airlines in 2021, with 4,290 of those related to mask-wearing rules.

FAA graphics show that incident numbers shot up between January and February 2021, around the time its “zero tolerance policy” was announced, and have since fluctuated but remained fairly high.

A Southwest Airlines spokesperson said: “We have no immediate comment to offer on this now-pending litigation, as we make an initial review of the complaint.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in