Collision-catchers: how helmet-cams took off

Cyclists are attaching video cameras to their helmets. Alas the police don't like it.

Simon Usborne
Thursday 13 September 2012 18:24
Comments
The Cateye Inou includes a GPS chip to record the location of an incident
The Cateye Inou includes a GPS chip to record the location of an incident

Dizzying scenes of barrelling waves and feats on mountainsides? Sure. The daily grind of the cycle commute? Not so exciting. But mini cameras, once the preserve of surfers and skiers, are starting to appear on the helmets and handlebars of bike riders, the latest weapon in a (silly, I believe) war on the roads.

Bike retailers report growing demand (75 per cent in the last year at Evans Cycles) for cameras that capture spills rather than thrills, recording evidence of bad driving. While still in the minority, video-cyclists have become numerous enough that two recently crossed paths when a driver pulled out in front of them. Their videos swiftly appeared on YouTube, showing a near miss and an angry exchange. "Look up your number plate on YouTube and you'll see the video!" one cyclist shouts. "You'll be on there twice," the other says. YouTube hums with such footage and sites such as PoliceWitness.com, run by a former police chief, try to get videos into the courts. The site also sells a range of "justice cameras" for use by drivers and cyclists, while other models serve as much as black boxes as cameras. The Cateye Inou includes a GPS chip to record the location of an incident.

Elsewhere, accelerometers tell cameras to save the last 10 minutes of footage in the event of an impact.

All very well, but the police don't like it (they and the Crown Prosecution Service say prosecution based on video evidence is unlikely). Nor do I. As a cyclist and driver, I say the wearing of cameras and what feels like the pursuit of confrontation by some only fuels a combative culture on our roads that contibutes to many of the incidents committed to YouTube. Is this worth it in the hope of an unlikely prosecution, a momentary shaming or any supposed visual deterrent offered by cameras? I say not.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in