Amidst an increasingly draconian crackdown on civil liberties spearheaded by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and his conservative Fidesz party, a new anti-LGBT+ law was passed by Hungary’s parliament on Tuesday – making the country the only European Union member to have such homophobic legislation.
As expected, such an illiberal measure has drawn the ire of various watchdogs and campaigners both across Hungary and the rest of Europe, who deem it symptomatic of the growing repressiveness being fostered in the Central European country. Apart from the way in which this new law seemingly makes the age-old and profoundly harmful association of homosexuality with paedophilia, it could also cause tangible harm to LGBT+ children.
In a country where 42 per cent of LGBT+ individuals have reportedly contemplated suicide and more than half of queer youths have reported feeling unsafe at school, cutting teenagers off from vital support networks could amount to a death sentence.
What this new law most urgently highlights, however, is that the rights and protections recently afforded to the LGBT+ community cannot be taken for granted. Hungary is not the first country to recently take a step backwards on this front. In 2013, the Russian government passed the infamous “gay propaganda law” – to which Hungary’s own law has been compared – that has stifled the development of a national Pride movement and has had a deeply damaging effect on the country’s LGBT+ community. Six years later, Poland witnessed the creation of “LGBT-free zones”, eventually taking up around a third of the country’s territory.
The far right, which demonises, and occasionally uses, the LGBT+ community as part of its political ping pong game and artificial culture wars, remains a powerful force across the world. The electoral appeal of nationalist demagogues may have been dented by their failure to tackle the Covid-19 crisis, but throughout Europe, hard-right parties maintain enough support to occupy a coveted vantage point from which to launch a blitz in upcoming general elections. With the far right retaining such a strong presence within the global political landscape, no LGBT+ individual or other minority can truly feel protected.
This all serves to illustrate why Pride remains just as necessary today as it was 50 years ago – even in a country like the UK, where the LGBT+ community enjoys near-equality and social acceptance in pockets of the country.
In London and other British cities, Pride has become such a star-studded fixture that it’s easy to forget what has always been at its heart: protest. While the gaudier, gimmicky commercialism that has attached itself to Pride has been rightly attacked, such criticisms are often unfairly conflated with another popular line of thought. “If LGBT+ people now have equal rights,” the argument usually goes, “why do we need Pride or this general onslaught of ‘rainbow’ media?”
But as hackneyed as it may sound, history has shown time and time again that rights are not set in stone, and can easily be reversed – especially when right-wing parties desperately need to pander to their electorate’s underlying insecurities to score extra political points. Pride remains important in a world that is still too ready to gnaw at LGBT+ rights when it sees fit. Apathy is dangerous, and complacency is the first step on the path towards totalitarianism.
Register for free to continue reading
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
Already have an account? sign in
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies