Letter: Causes of leukaemia

Mr Malcolm C. Grimston
Sunday 17 October 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Sir: Contrary to Beatrix Campbell's statement about the Seascale leukaemia cases (13 October), there is a very plausible, though still technically 'unproven', alternative explanation for the Seascale leukaemia excesses.

Dr Leo Kinlen of the Cancer Research Campaign has gathered considerable evidence that the cause may be some infectious agent, carried to remote areas like West Cumbria by immune individuals from highly populated industrial areas. This, and the fact that the Gardner findings have not been replicated in large studies carried out in Scotland, Denmark, Canada, etc, makes radiation as a cause look extremely unlikely.

What children with leukaemia across the nation - the majority of them nowhere near nuclear establishments - need is a truce in the battle Ms Campbell identifies. Research must be carried out to find the true cause of the disease, not a perceived 'cause' useful to a particular campaign. Far too many children have already suffered because researchers have been forced to focus on one line of enquiry which now seems to be empty.

Yours sincerely,

MALCOLM C. GRIMSTON

Energy Issues Adviser

British Nuclear Industry Forum

London, SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in