LETTERS: Weddings and optional extras

The Rev T. R. Barker
Wednesday 13 December 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

From The Rev T. R. Barker

Sir: Mrs M. Harris (letter, 9 December) draws attention to an important issue but hits the wrong target. The legal fees for a marriage service in the Church of England, from 1 January 1996, will be pounds 114, plus pounds 12 for the banns of marriage. To this can be added - if the couple request such services and if they are available in their parish church - charges for music (the organist and choir), the ringing of the church bells, flowers and additional heating.

Yet, even if all these extra charges are added in a large parish church, the church fees remain a very small part of the cost of the average marriage. The trouble is that, for a whole variety of reasons, couples choose to spend vast amounts of money on cars, videos, photographs and dresses for the bride and bridesmaids - and that is before taking into account the cost of the wedding reception, the almost inevitable evening party and a honeymoon.

When one looks at the substantial cost of an elaborate wedding, even in a less affluent community, the church fees are almost small change. It is perfectly possible to have a church wedding without all the extra expenditure that so many couples choose.

If the cost of a church wedding really is beyond the means of some couples, then perhaps we have to look again at our charges. But the prospect of running a means test in the vestry of the vicarage does not appeal.

Yours faithfully,

T. R. Barker

Diocesan Communications Officer

Chester

10 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in