The Nunes memo is a very serious attempt to scupper the Russian investigation

Trump is said to have claimed that what comes out in the memo will give him the ammunition to fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein – the only official who can sack special counsel Robert Mueller

Kim Sengupta
Friday 02 February 2018 14:19
Comments
This has been the latest, and the most high-profile, of Nunes’ attempts to save Trump
This has been the latest, and the most high-profile, of Nunes’ attempts to save Trump

Special counsel Robert Mueller is the ultimate target in the release of a doctored version of a classified House Intelligence Committee memo by the White House. And the dossier produced by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele is very much in the centre of this attempt to scupper the investigation into Donald Trump’s Russian connections.

As the inquiry into whether Donald Trump was the Muscovite Candidate in the US presidential election continues to make progress, with Mueller’s team starting to look at murky business affairs as well as other Kremlin links, the President’s supporters are increasingly desperate in their efforts to halt it in its tracks.

The narrative being put forward in the three and half page memo, compiled by Republicans in the House Committee, is that a group of politically motivated Justice Department and FBI officials started a campaign to sabotage the Trump presidency. That they used the material in former MI6 spy Steele’s report to obtain a wiretap order against Carter Page, a Trump campaign official with links to powerful figures in Moscow. And that in doing so they failed to disclose to the judge issuing the order that Steele’s research has been part-funded by the Democrats.

It should be pointed out that the Democrats in the House Committee have accused the Republicans, led by chairman Devin Nunes, of altering the content of the memo the Committee had agreed on. The Republicans admit doing so, but claim that the changes made were minor. The FBI, however, complained strongly that there are “material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact on the memo’s accuracy”. The Republican-dominated committee voted down a Democrat proposal that their rebuttal, pointing out the inaccuracies of the Republican memo, should also be made public.

Michael Wolff: Trump presidency will end if Russia investigation touches on his finances

To put this in context, what became the Steele report was, in fact, originally commissioned by Republican opponents of Trump during the race for the party nomination. They hired the Washington-based firm Fusion GPS, which in turn brought in Steele because of his knowledge of Russia acquired while working for British intelligence. The Republican clients had no more need for the information after Trump won the candidacy and the Democrats briefly took over the commission. They too stopped after Trump’s election victory, at which point Steele continued working without pay for a while so worried was he by what was being discovered. The FBI had been receiving material from Steele’s research for a while: FBI Director James Comey – subsequently fired by Trump – was handed the report by the Republican Senator John McCain, who had obtained it from London.

The Justice Department has pointed out that the Steele report was not the only material presented to the judge to obtain the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) order. And that it is also the case that the allegations made in the report have been independently verified by US intelligence. The Department said in a statement: “The FBI takes seriously its obligations to the FISA Court and its compliance with procedures overseen by career professionals in the Department of Justice and the FBI. We are committed to working with the appropriate oversight entities to ensure the continuing integrity of the FISA process.”

The White House wants to release the Republican memo as it will undoubtedly aid Trump’s tale of being a victim of a mythical “Deep State”. Nunes, whom his hometown newspaper in California has called “Trump’s stooge”, had refused to answer whether his staff had colluded with the White House on this. When questioned, White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said she could not rule out the possibility of collusion, saying: “I just don’t know the answer.”

This has been the latest, and the most high-profile, of Nunes’ attempts to save Trump. He has had to temporarily step down in the past as the chairman of the House Committee after being exposed over secret contacts with the White House over the House’s Russia inquiry. And this is not the first time he had tried to use Christopher Steele to undermine the three investigations into the matter.

In August last year, two staffers from the House Intelligence Committee suddenly turned up at the London office of Steele’s company, Orbis. Not finding him there, they went to the office of his lawyer and demanded to see him. The timing of the visit was of importance. Mueller and the Senate Intelligence Committee, carrying out separate Russia investigations, were making progress in their attempts to speak to the former MI6 officer. The two men had been sent by Republican members of the House Committee with the aim, it was suspected, of intimidating Steele.

If the ultimate goal of the memo is to shut down the Mueller investigation, the immediate target is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, the only official who can sack Mueller – and then only if he can prove that the special counsel has been guilty of misconduct.

Rosenstein has resisted pressure from Trump and his supporters to turn against Mueller, incurring their wrath. Trump has repeatedly railed against Rosenstein. Even last July he was annoyed that “Rosenstein is from Baltimore: there are very few Republicans from Baltimore, if any, he is a Democrat”. Rosenstein, it has been pointed out, is neither from Baltimore nor a Democrat. But Trump saw him as threat and, as the Mueller investigation grew in scope and success, it became increasingly imperative, it seems, to get rid of him.

Rosenstein has been repeatedly attacked by Trump’s fellow travellers. Now they are implicating the Deputy Attorney General in the Carter Page FISA because, they say, he agreed to a FBI request to renew the Page surveillance. Fox News host Sean Hannity, who often acts as Trump’s mouthpiece, declared that the Nunes memo showed “beyond any shadow of a doubt that the special counsel, Robert Mueller, and his band of Democratic witch hunters never should have been appointed and they need to be disbanded immediately… Did Rosenstein sign off on extension of this FISA warrant? I’m very interested about Rod Rosenstein in all of this.” Rosenstein, declared Hannity, should be fired.

Trump is said to have claimed that what comes out in the memo will give him the ammunition to fire Rosenstein. This, of course, would allow installing a replacement who may be more amenable to obey orders and, when the time comes, either hamstring Mueller or find a reason to fire him.

The Mueller investigation has made good progress. Two senior members of the Trump team, former campaign manager Paul Manafort and former national security advisor Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, have been arrested and charged along with one who was more junior, George Papadopoulos, who is regarded as an important link in the alleged conspiracy. The activities of Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, are under intense scrutiny from Mueller’s investigators and a false alibi Trump allegedly had a hand in concocting about a meeting between Trump Jr, Kushner, Manafort and a Russian lawyer, it has been revealed, is now a focus of attention.

It is because of this success that Mueller has become so dangerous for Trump and his coterie. And the release of the doctored Nunes memo may well give the President the path he has been seeking to shut down the Special Envoy’s Russia investigation, saving himself and those close to him.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in