Someone tell Prince Charles we’re no longer an absolute monarchy
The Independent has revealed that the Prince lays down an absurdly draconian set of demands upon media organisations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The environmental work the Prince of Wales has carried out over much of his lifetime adds currency to his opinions on climate change. That said, his view that it lies at the heart of the civil war in Syria points to a less than perfect understanding of geopolitics. Like most other commentators, he has strong points and weak points – and like all other commentators, he should be open to journalists and, by proxy, the public scrutinising his opinions as they are expressed. Or at least, if Charles wants to play a role in the public debate – as he does over the importance of the Paris climate talks – he must play by the same rules as everybody else. That, however, is not the practice of Clarence House, as The Independent has revealed.
An absurdly draconian set of demands made upon media organisations should disqualify the Prince from the off. It is inappropriate for an opinionated man such as he to be able not only to dictate the precise questions in advance, but also to pull his own material from the final cut if the programme does not satisfy him. Channel 4 wisely decided not to sign up to such a contract. Those media organisations that have agreed to it should be aware that they have debased themselves in doing so. Nobody’s opinion is worth agreeing to such censorship; least of all, some might say, an unelected member of an outdated institution.
We know from the infamous “black spider” memos that the Prince has previously used his position to gain privilege with those in power. He is likely to be a far more activist monarch than his mother, the Queen. This is discomfiting, particularly so if he plans to set the terms of any public engagement.
Charles should think again. If he does not, the media should break royal protocol, and dare to report on him properly.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments