Royal fans point out ‘hypocrisy’ of Meghan and Harry’s treatment after Prince Andrew settlement

‘Horrific double standards,’ one person claimed

Leer en Español

Royal fans are defending Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and pointing out the “hypocrisy” in the way the royal couple was treated by the public, the press, and the royal family after Prince Andrew reached a multi-million-dollar settlement with Virginia Giuffre.

The Queen’s son, who was accused of sexually abusing Giuffre, a Jeffrey Epstein victim, when she was underage, confirmed the settlement in a statement, in which he also said he regretted his association with the late paedophile.

In light of the settlement, which is reported to be as high as £12m, many have taken the opportunity to point out the hypocrisy in the treatment of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who announced they would be stepping down from their duties as members of the royal family in January 2020 and who have since relocated to California.

“Your regular reminder that Harry and Meghan got excommunicated from the royal family for eating avocados and asking politely not to be racially abused,” one person tweeted, referring to a 2019 headline that read: “How Meghan’s favourite avocado snack - beloved of all millennials - is fuelling human rights abuses, drought and murder,” as well as the couple’s claims to Oprah Winfrey in March.

Another said: “I’m still waiting for the media to give Prince Andrew the same energy they give Meghan and Harry.”

“Why is the reporting around Andrew far less vicious than anything around Meghan/Harry. I mean, according to the press, naming their child Lilibet caused the Queen way more upset and distress than this horrendous debacle,” someone else tweeted.

Others suggested that critics of the couple would try to find a way to blame the duke and duchess for the Prince Andrew situation.

“Waiting for a certain section of society to blame Meghan Markle for Prince Andrew settling out of court in 5, 4, 3, 2…” one individual said, while someone else wrote: “They are going to find a way to blame Meghan Markle for Prince Andrew aren’t they?”

Harry and Meghan spoke at length about the way they were reportedly treated by members of the royal family and the media while living in the UK during a tell-all interview with Winfrey in March of last year. At the time, Meghan said that her time as a royal was “almost unsurvivable” and that she struggled with suicidal thoughts, but did not receive mental health help despite her requests.

Prince Andrew has denied the allegations against him, and claimed that he has never met Ms Giuffre, despite a photograph allegedly showing him and Ms Giuffre in Ghislaine Maxwell’s home.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in