For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails
Sign up to our free breaking news emails
The UK High Court has ruled that KitKat cannot trademark the shape of its four-finger bars.
The ruling is the latest in a long running dispute with Cadbury.
Nestlé wanted to stop other chocolate-makers like its rival Cadbury from producing a similar shaped chocolate bar. But the UK High Court ruled against the trademark, arguing that other four-finger bars exist that customers do not confuse with KitKats.
“KitKat is much loved and the iconic shape of the four-finger bar, which has been used in the UK for more than 80 years, is well known by consumers," a spokesman said.
"We believe that the shape deserves to be protected as a trade mark in the UK and are disappointed that the court did not agree on this occasion."
Nestle argued that its four-finger bar had been associated with the company since it was launched in 1935, citing a survey that showed 90% of people associated an unbranded four-finger chocolate bar with Nestle.
But its case was weakened by the existence of a similar, Norwegian product - Kvikk Lunsj, meaning ‘quick lunch’ - that has been around since 1937.
Business news: In pictures
Show all 13
The legal battle was the latest in a long-running chocolate war with Cadbury, which had launched a challenge to Nestlé's attempts to patent the design in court.
The decade-long dispute started when Cadbury sought to trademark the colour purple.
Nestlé succeeded in overturning the purple trademark in 2013 and Cadbury has been seeking retribution ever since.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies