Rio 2016: BBC commentator clarifies 'what's for tea?' comment about Laura Trott after sexism accusations

Chris Boardman made the comment after Laura Trott and Jason Kenny's record-breaking performances in the Velodrome

Olivia Blair
Wednesday 17 August 2016 19:55
Comments
Chris Boardman says 'What's for tea?' comment has 'nothing to do with gender'

A BBC cycling commentator has insisted comments he made about Laura Trott and Jason Kenny had "nothing to do with gender" after they sparked a sexism row.

On Tuesday night, two new achievements were set by British athletes at the Rio velodrome. Trott became the most decorated female British athlete ever after winning a gold in the Omnium. Her fiance, Kenny, claimed victory in the Keirin after a tense final which saw two false starts equalling Sir Chris Hoy's record six gold medals – the most for any British athlete. Their collective amount of medals would theoretically place them 13th in the overall medal table, above Spain and New Zealand.

Following Kenny’s victory, commentators described the emotional scenes between the couple, who are due to marry in September. As Trott tearily rushed to congratulate Kenny after anxiously waiting for the result commentator Chris Boardman said: “She’s doing the emotion for both of them really, he’s looking at her going: ‘What’s for tea?’”

The comment soon provoked ire with some perceiving the comment to be gendered and yet another example of casual sexism at the Olympics.

Following the backlash, Boardman clarified his comments had “nothing to do with gender”.

His wife Sally also defended him saying he is a feminist and his comment was “misinterpreted” when responding to The Pool columnist Sali Hughes who had quoted him on Twitter.

Clare Balding, who has been fronting the Velodrome coverage throughout the games, also appeared to make light of the comment by sharing a selfie of herself and Boardman with the hashtag #whatsfortea.

Boardman’s comment is not the first remark to spark debate from a BBC commentator. Earlier this week, Andy Murray was widely praised on social media for “reminding” John Inverdale that “women are people too”. The praise came after the presenter wrongly proclaimed the tennis champion to be the “first person ever to win two Olympic tennis gold medals”, apparently forgetting Venus and Serena Willliams have won four golds each.

Prior to this, the BBC apologised for an “ill-judged” comment from tennis commentator Paul Hand who said: “Let's hope they don't go onto two blokes sat next to each other” when discussing the 'kiss-cam' which was targeting tennis spectators. Hand was also criticised for describing the emotional response of male tennis players, including Murray, as “not macho” after the 29-year-old won gold.

A representative for the BBC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in