Employment tribunal fees: MPs claim 'damage is already done' in open letter to Justice Secretary

Exclusive: More than 70 MPs demand Government recompenses workers who were unable to bring forward workplace tribunal cases due to high fees, which were this week ruled unlawful

May Bulman
Friday 28 July 2017 18:12
Comments
Seventy-three Labour MPs, led by shadow minister for diverse communities Dawn Butler, have signed a joint letter to David Lidington claiming the damage caused by workplace tribunal fees ‘has already been done’
Seventy-three Labour MPs, led by shadow minister for diverse communities Dawn Butler, have signed a joint letter to David Lidington claiming the damage caused by workplace tribunal fees ‘has already been done’

More than 70 MPs have called on the Justice Secretary to refund workers who have not been able to bring forward employment cases in recent years due to high tribunal fees, following a Supreme Court ruling that the fees were unlawful.

Seventy-three Labour MPs have signed a joint letter to David Lidington claiming the damage caused by the fees “has already been done”, and urging the Government to recompense people in a timely manner, including those who were never able to bring their cases to court in the first place.

The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that workplace tribunal fees were unlawful, forcing the Government to repay more than £27m forked out by employees for cases around unfair dismissal, discrimination and other workplace issues since July 2013.

Trade union Unison said thousands of people had been charged for taking claims to tribunal since fees were introduced by Chris Grayling, the then Lord Chancellor.

Justice minister Dominic Raab announced following the ruling that the Government would take steps to stop charging the fees and refund thousands of people who have paid in recent years.

The open letter to Mr Lidington, led by shadow minister for diverse communities Dawn Butler MP, states that Employment Tribunal fees have “disproportionately impacted on women and diverse communities”, highlighting that many people have subsequently not been able to afford to bring cases to court in the first place.

“It is a fact that the employment tribunal fees have disproportionately impacted on women and diverse communities. We are pleased that these fees have now been overturned following the challenge by Unison, however we are concerned about the damage which has already been done,” it reads.

“As you will be aware, there has been a 79 per cent reduction in cases over three years since the fees were introduced, with many people sadly not being able to afford to bring important cases to court. These people are often on low incomes and some of the most vulnerable people in society.

“We would therefore like to ask what plans you have to recompense all those individuals who were unable to progress their claims due to the fees? These fees blocked access to justice to so many people and potentially ruined lives, so it is essential that the Government makes amends to them.”

It proceeds to state that as well as pledging the repayment of up to £32m to claimants who were able to take their cases forward, it should also “outline this commitment in detail” and make clear the timescale for these repayments, adding: “Every person should be paid back in full and as soon as possible.”

The MPs add at the end of the letter that the Ministry of Justice should reveal how much was spent on fighting the case, demanding: “Finally, we would like to know how much public money has been spent by the Government in fighting this case in court?”

Ms Butler pushed for the Government to release its review into the fees last year as part of a long campaign on the issue, which included an online petition against the fees.

Following the result of the court case on Wednesday, Ms Butler said: “The judgement of the Supreme Court that overturned the Conservative government’s policy on tribunal fees shines a light on the lies Theresa May told on the steps of Number 10 when she promised to tackle ‘burning injustices’.

“I challenged the Government repeatedly on this throughout their review and always knew that these fees were cruel and unlawful. I congratulate Unison for bringing this to court. Now let’s try and rectify the damage of this cruel Government has inflicted on the many.”

Mr Raab said: “In setting employment tribunal fees, the Government has to consider access to justice, the costs of litigation, and how we fund the tribunals.

“The Supreme Court recognised the important role fees can play, but ruled that we have not struck the right balance in this case. We will take immediate steps to stop charging fees in employment tribunals and put in place arrangements to refund those who have paid.

“We will also further consider the detail of the judgement.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in