Sir Philip Green rejects claims of sexual harassment and racism, insisting he was only involved in ‘banter’

‘I’m being used as target practice,’ billionaire complains

Philip Green confronted down by Sky News reporter

Sir Philip Green has rejected allegations that he sexually harassed and racially abused his staff – insisting he had only been involved in “some banter”.

The Topshop boss complained he was being “used as target practice” after a former MP named him in parliament as the businessman at the centre of the claims.

“I’m very, very, very upset,” he told the Mail on Sunday. “It’s injuring my business, all the people potentially working in the business, and it’s injuring me and my family.”

He added: “I’ve been in business for more than 40 years. There has obviously from time to time been some banter and a bit of humour, but as far as I’m concerned there was never any intent to be offensive. If anything I’ve said has caused offence, I’m happy to apologise. Nothing I’ve said was ever meant to be offensive.”

Sir Philip, who is staying at a health resort in Tucson, Arizona, said he had suffered “the worst week of my life” and added that his wife Tina was “appalled that people are are treating us like this”.

“It’s a horror story,” he added. “Somebody can say whatever they like and people just follow you around, chasing you and harassing you.”

He also claimed that several current and former employees had offered their support since the allegations were made public.

“The whole thing is disgusting, this has got nothing to do with any sexual misconduct,” said Sir Philip. “It’s nonsense.”

The retail tycoon has taken out a temporary privacy injunction to prevent the media from publishing the claims but was named by former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain in parliament last week.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

It has since emerged that Lord Hain is an adviser for the law firm Gordon Dadds, which is fighting the case on behalf of The Daily Telegraph.

Sir Philip has said he intends to complain to parliamentary authorities that Lord Hain failed to disclose he had a financial relationship with the newspaper’s lawyers.

“I have been advised that his actions are likely to have been a breach of the House of Lords code of conduct,” said Sir Philip. “As many people have said, Lord Hain’s blatant disregard of a judgment made by three senior judges is outrageous.”

In an earlier statement he “categorically and wholly” denied allegations of “unlawful sexual or racist behaviour”.

Lord Hain said he was unaware that Gordon Dadds was involved in the case and dismissed Sir Philip’s allegation as a “malevolent diversion”.

“I stand resolutely by what I’ve said and neither retract nor apologise for standing up for human rights,” he said.

Lord Hain has been criticised by legal experts for naming the businessman in parliament while the case was still going through the courts.

Former attorney general Dominic Grieve QC said Lord Hain’s behaviour had been “clearly arrogant”.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in