Republican who rejected bipartisan riot commission complains special committee is not bipartisan

Only two Republicans – Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger – vote for select committee to investigate riot and aftermath following GOP blockade against bipartisan probe

Alex Woodward
New York
Wednesday 30 June 2021 21:32
Comments

After congressional Republicans widely rejected a bipartisan commission to investigate the Capitol riot, US Rep Michelle Fischbach claimed that “Democrats refuse to put together a truly bipartisan commission” – after she voted against the bipartisan attempt from both Democrats and Republicans.

“Give me a break,” Democratic US Rep Jim McGovern told the House of Representatives on 30 June.

House Democrats are moving forward with a select committee after Senate Republicans blocked a bipartisan probe into the events surrounding the 6 January riot and its aftermath, after a mob fuelled by Donald Trump’s baseless narrative that the 2020 presidential election was “stolen” from him stormed the halls of Congress to overturn the votes of millions of Americans.

“I noticed there’s a lack of Republicans who have the backbone to come down here and explain ... why they won’t support the bipartisan commission or the select committee,” Mr McGovern said. “They don’t want to be on the record defending a position aimed at not getting the truth.”

Only two Republicans – Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, both prominent GOP critics of the former president – voted to support the select committee on Wednesday.

The House voted 222 to 190 to create the committee, with Ms Cheney and Mr Kinzinger joining all present Democrats to support it, and all other GOP lawmakers rejecting it.

Though she said in a statement that a bipartisan investigation would be “the best way” to probe the assault, Ms Cheney condemend the former president by name for his persistent attempts to undermine the electoral process.

“On an almost daily basis, Donald Trump repeats the same statements that provoked violence before,” she said. “His attacks on our Constitution are accelerating. Our responsibility is to confront these threats, not appease and deflect.”

A select committee remains the “only remaining option” for a congressional investigation, she said.

The bipartisan measure passed the House last month, but with only 35 Republicans voting with Democrats to support it.

Ms Fischbach did not; she blamed Senate Republicans for blocking its passage.

“Now we’re blaming the Senate?” Mr McGovern said. “175 of my Republican colleagues voted against [the bipartisan commission]. They were complicit.”

The bipartisan effort led by Republican Rep John Katko with Democratic Rep Bennie Thompson proposed a 10-person commission, with each party getting an equal number of members and subpoena power, similarly modelled after the congressional commission that followed the 11 September terror attacks.

After that proposal was blocked in the Senate, House Democrats introduced a resolution creating a13-member committee to include five Republicans, and it will issue a final report with “findings, conclusions, and recommendations” to the House.

Ms Fischbach claimed that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s committee is “far more skewed” than Republicans’ partisan Benghazi hearings – despite the language in the resolution being the exact same.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said Republican objections sound as if they were “written by Lewis Carroll”.

Democratic Caucus Chair Hakeem Jeffries condemned GOP lawmakers for apparent hypocrisy, alleging that “the radical right consistently claims to be the party of law and order, but they refuse to sign off on an investigation” into an attack that “embodies lawlessness”.

House Republicans “have chosen party over patriotism, they have chosen autocracy over democracy, they have chosen the ‘big lie’ over the rule of law” and “conspiracy theories over the Constitution”, Mr Jeffries said.

In a letter to colleagues on Wednesday, Speaker Pelosi said the commission “will investigate and report upon the facts and causes of the attack. It will report on conclusions and recommendations for preventing any future assault. And it will find the truth.”

Democratic US Rep Jackie Speier, who survived five gunshot wounds in Guyana while working as an aide to Leo Ryan during the Jonestown massacre, said she was reminded of that day in 1978 as a mob broke into the Capitol.

“I thought at that moment, ‘My God, I survived Guyana, but I’m not going to survive this in the House of democracy in the country in which I was born,’” she said.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in