Biden vows action to protect abortion rights as John Roberts confirms leaked opinion
Supreme Court ‘poised to inflict greatest restriction of rights in the past 50 years’, say leading Dems
Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox
Get our free Inside Washington email
Leading Democrats have condemned the reported decision of the US Supreme Court to overturn the Roe v Wade ruling that legalised abortion nationwide nearly 50 years ago. Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed that the leaked draft was authentic, as President Joe Biden vowed to fight the court’s imminent decision.
Congressional Democratic leadership said the Republican-appointed justices who reportedly endorsed Justioce Samuel Alito’s opinion were “poised to inflict the greatest restriction of rights in the past 50 years,” as abortion rights
The decision indicates that the Supreme Court’s conservative majority will uphold a Mississippi law criminalising abortion care at 15 weeks of pregnancy, in the case of Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organisation, and overrule precedents established in Roe and affirmed by the 1993 decision in Casey v Planned Parenthood.
Republican officials have meanwhile celebrated the likely demise of Roe while condemning the “leak” from the nation’s high court.
Most Americans back abortion rights, polling finds
A majority of Americans do not want the US Supreme Court to overturn the precedent established in a landmark case protecting the right to abortion care without excessive government intervention, according to a recent CNN poll conducted by SSRS.
Poll after poll has shown significant support for Roe and the constitutional right to seek abortion services, with a poll in September 2021 showing 65 per cent of respondents in support of the 1973 law.
The poll, for Fox News, was the highest ever figure for the conservative TV network.
Most Americans support abortion rights, polls show
Opinion polling suggests strong opposition to Republican efforts
Republicans say consequences for abortion should be left to states if Supreme Court overturns Roe v Wade
Republican senators have expressed outrage over the leak of a draft opinion of the Supreme Court’s decision that would effectively overturn Roe v Wade. But when asked what the consequences should be for abortion providers or women who seek abortions, Republicans mostly said it would be up to states to decide.
“I think there should be an investigation about the leak, it’s an outrage and unprecedented in the history of our Republican,” said Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi, whose state’s law that bans abortion after 15 weeks is at the centre of the case before the Supreme Court.
Republicans say consequences for abortion should be left to states
Comes after a draft opinion overturning Roe v Wade leaked
Mapped: The states that will ban abortion entirely if Roe v Wade is overturned
Oklahoma abortion providers vow legal challenge as governor signs 6-week ban into law
Abortion rights advocates and civil rights groups have pledged to challenge a pair of Oklahoma laws banning abortion at six weeks of pregnancy and making abortion care a felony punishable up to 10 years in prison.
A judge has rejected a request for a temporary restraining order to block the six-week ban, which now immediately goes into effect.
Oklahoma abortion providers vow legal challenge as governor signs 6-week ban into law
Judge rejects attempt to temporarily halt law, which now immediately goes into effect
Biden urges voters to ‘elect pro-choice officials’ as Democrats hope ‘radical’ leak rallies midterm base
For at least two generations of American women, the constitutional protections affirmed by the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in Roe v Wade were both practical safeguards and a symbol of bodily autonomy and a women’s agency used to navigate the fragility of abortion care in the US.
If the court overturns that precedent, abortion advocates warn Americans must “brace for a future where more and more people are punished and criminalised for seeking and providing abortion care.”
The Independent’s Andrew Buncombe on what the forthcoming ruling could mean for the court –and its growing abuse by religious activists – as well as midterm elections, the Biden administration and abortion rights in America:
Biden urges voters to ‘elect pro-choice officials this November’
Two generations of women have relied upon Roe to access legal and safe abortions, writes Andrew Buncombe
Stephen Colbert slams conservative justices over Roe draft, labels ‘liars’
Stephen Colbert, a self-proclaimed devout Christian and Sunday school teacher, addressed his audience late Tuesday night with a reflection that seemed to sum up a lot of the sentiment in the country after a draft opinion threatening to reverse Roe v Wade was leaked late Monday night.
“Well, f***,” the late night host began with an exasperated sigh. “You know what we’re going to be talking about tonight, so strap in.”
He went on to explain how his original plan for that night’s monologue had been discussing Monday’s night’s MET Gala, but, he joked, he was now forced to talk about “another group of out of touch people in crazy outfits pretending that it’s 1895, the Supreme Court”.
“So congratulations ladies - decisions about what you can do with your body are now being made by four old dudes and a woman who thinks The Handmaid’s Tale is a romcom,” the late night host quipped, referring to the popular book-turned-TV series set in a dystopic America where women are forced to live as concubines under a theocratic dictatorship.
After a series of hot takes, the CBS host then took the justices to task who had previously claimed during their confirmation hearings - namely, Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh - that Roe was “settled as a precedent” and “law of the land”.
“American voters support abortion in all or most cases at 80 per cent. They knew that if they were honest, they wouldn’t get the job, so they lied, which I think is perjury,” Colbert said. “But what do I know? I’m not a Supreme Court justice. I’m not a good enough liar.”
Watch the full Tuesday night monologue below.
Opinion: If Roe v Wade is overturned, the backlash could hurt Republicans badly
In the wake of a draft outlining the potential overturn of the landmark legislation Roe v Wade being leaked on Monday night, there is going to be an immediate political fallout for both Democrats and Republicans, analysts agree. Particularly, they note, as the two parties look ahead to the fall midterms.
But the GOP, the party that has championed the cause of reversing the near half a century old precedent, could feel that heat more intensely, The Independent’s senior Washington correspondent writes.
“This is really unprecedented, and just to be frank with you is going to piss a lot of people off across the country,” Marcela Mulholland, political director for the progressive polling outlet Data for Progress, told me in the wake of the news. “And there’s been a lot of talk about this being a tough midterm cycle for Democrats. But I really think there’s no telling how a decision like this could have ramifications and really be a backlash against conservatives who are stripping people of their constitutional rights to bodily autonomy.”
To continue reading the op-ed from The Independent’s Eric Garcia, click below.
Republicans don’t realise the backlash they’ll face if Roe is overturned
Truth be told, both parties now find themselves in a tight spot
Politico staffers reportedly told to be ‘vigilant’ about who enters office in wake of historic leak
Politico, the outlet behind the historic scoop about a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that could strike down Roe v Wade, has reportedly told its staff entering their building to remain “vigilant” about who enters the office elevators with them.
The New York Times reporter Katie Robertson, who covers the media, tweeted on Tuesday about an internal memo sent to Politico employees that detailed how they were being cautioned in the wake of the leak the outlet first reported on.
“Politico employees have been advised to be vigilant about who enters elevators with them at the office, and to consider removing any personal details from social media accounts that identify them as Politico staff, according to an internal memo,” Ms Robertson tweeted.
What is an ectopic pregnancy and how dangerous is it?
In addition to Monday’s leaked draft that outlines a potential overturning of Roe v Wade, last week, Oklahoma approved a bill to outlaw abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, even in the case of rape and incest.
While the bill makes exceptions for medical emergencies, such as ectopic pregnancies, state senator Warren Hamilton questioned why it should do so during a debate on the wider abortion ban.
His comments prompted hundreds of women on social media to share their experiences with ectopic pregnancies and how having an abortion saved their lives, and accused Hamilton of wanting to “sentence women to death”.
Continue reading the full article from The Independent below, which explains the risks and concerns associated with an ectopic pregnancy.
What is an ectopic pregnancy and how dangerous is it?
Anti-abortion legislation in the US could outlaw abortions even in medical emergencies
Barack Obama issues statement on Supreme Court draft decision after facing criticism for inaction during his administration
Former President Barack Obama issued a statement Tuesday concerning the leaked Supreme Court draft decision aiming at overturning Roe v. Wade.
“If the Supreme Court ultimately decides to overturn the landmark case of Roe v. Wade, then it will not only reverse nearly 50 years of precedent – it will relegate the most intensely personal decision someone can make to the whims of politicians and ideologues.
Few, if any women, make the decision to terminate a pregnancy casually – and people of goodwill, across the political spectrum, can hold different views on the subject. But what Roe recognised is that the freedom enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution requires all of us to enjoy a sphere of our lives that isn’t subject to meddling from the state – a sphere that includes personal decisions involving who we sleep with, who we marry, whether or not to use contraception, and whether or not to bear children.”
Mr Obama has faced criticism today for failing to codify Roe v. Wade into law during his presidency, which he said would be the “first thing he would do” as president.
He later said codifying the law was “not his highest legislative priority” when asked why he failed to deliver on his promise.
Read his full statement below.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies