Jamie Carragher claims Tottenham’s defenders are ‘nowhere near good enough’

Spurs have lost five of their last six games in all competitions with Jose Mourinho’s approach criticised

Jack Rathborn
Tuesday 16 February 2021 10:55
Comments
Riyad Mahrez takes on Eric Dier and Davinson Sanchez
Riyad Mahrez takes on Eric Dier and Davinson Sanchez

Jamie Carragher has claimed Tottenham’s defenders are “nowhere near good enough” to hold on to leads while criticising Jose Mourinho’s approach this season.

Spurs have suffered five defeats in six games in all competitions, with Manchester City inflicting a a 3-0 beating on Mourinho’s side last weekend, which leaves them ninth in the table and six points off the top four.

And while analysing Mourinho’s squad and his tactics, Carragher labelled the Portuguese manager as “reactive” in contrast to the majority of the top managers in Europe now being “proactive”.

The former Liverpool defender has criticised the approach due to Spurs’ inability to hold on to leads, having dropped 10 points from winning positions at half-time this season - the most in the Premier League.

READ MORE: ‘Very tired’ Tottenham punished by ‘modern penalty’ decision, says Jose Mourinho

“What really stood out for me was watching Chelsea go to Tottenham and how they set up. This was Thomas Tuchel’s third game in charge. Jose has been there 12 months. And Jose played that game to stop them,” Carragher explained on Sky Sports’ Monday Night Football.

“Going into that game, Chelsea were behind Tottenham and Tottenham were at home. It almost summed up the way we see managers right now and where Jose is.

Ilkay Gundogan scores while under pressure from Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg and Eric Dier

“Steven Bergwijn and Tanguy Ndombele’s job was to press or man-mark the opposition central midfield players. It was very narrow, something different just to stop Chelsea.

“It was really evident that this was Jose trying to do a job. It was not about hurting Chelsea, it was not about what we were going to do, it was about them. We are not saying that attackers should not defend, but it was almost like their job was to man-mark the opposition with no thought of how they were going to play themselves.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in