Three Australia Open players allowed entry with same vaccine exemption as Novak Djokovic

Djokovic saw his attempts to enter Australia denied on Thursday

Courtney Walsh
Friday 07 January 2022 13:04
Comments
Novak Djokovic: Why was tennis star denied entry into Australia and what happens next?
Leer en Español

At least three other participants in the Australian Open with the same medical exemption as Novak Djokovic are already in the country with more potentially arriving over the next week.

After Djokovic a second player, Renata Voracova, has now been placed into detention in a sweep by authorities on those who entered the country under the same vaccination exemption as Djokovic, Czech authorities and ABC reported on Friday.

Czech Republic doubles specialist Voracova had played in Melbourne earlier this week but has been asked to leave Australia after being detained by Border Force officials. It was unclear if she intended to challenge the decision, ABC reported, citing a source familiar with the matter.

“We can confirm that Czech tennis player Renata Voracova is in the same detention as Djokovic, together with several other players,” the Czech Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

“We submitted through our embassy in Canberra a protest note and are asking for an explanation of the situation. However, Renata Voracova decided to drop out of the tournament due to limited possibilities for training and to leave Australia.”

Djokovic was spending the Orthodox Christmas in detention on Friday having had his visa cancelled on arrival in Australia when officials ruled his documentation was insufficient to allow him entry to the country while unvaccinated.

The political fallout, both domestically and abroad, intensified overnight as Djokovic’s legal team prepared documents aimed at extending his stay after a Federal court hearing in Melbourne on Monday.

The 20-times Grand Slam winner might not be the only person hoping to take part in the Australian Open to face removal from the country, however.

Home affairs minister Karen Andrews has confirmed the Australian Border Force is assessing the credentials of two others who entered the country under the same exemption granted to Djokovic.

A source familiar with the matter told Reuters that a third participant in the Grand Slam also entered Australia on the same framework, which had been put in place by Tennis Australia and the Victoria State government.

Exemptions may also have been granted to players or officials who are yet to arrive in Australia, the source added.

While the tournament proper begins on 17 January, ITF Junior events and wheelchair tournaments are set to begin next week, so too the qualifying events for the Australian Open.

TA has not commented on the matter since Djokovic was initially detained at Melbourne Airport shortly after 11pm on Wednesday.

Tournament director Craig Tiley, who is also the TA chief executive, defended the medical exemption granted to Djokovic prior to his detention.

Srdjan Djokovic, the detained player’s father, has claimed more than 20 exemptions were handed out to tennis participants prior to the Australian Border Force’s intervention.

Tiley said this week 26 claims for exemptions had been lodged, but only a “handful” had been approved.

Djokovic’s legal team is expected to file further documents on Saturday supporting the nine-times Australian Open champion’s bid for an injunction to delay his departure.

Djokovic is currently being detained in Melbourne

Justin Quill, a partner with Thomson Geer who specialises in media law, said Djokovic might be able to play the Australian Open even while his challenge to the deportation decision proceeds.

He said if Djokovic’s interim injunction was successful, the hearing into the matter proper was likely to be listed for a date falling well after the completion of the tournament on January 30.

“When you look at interlocutory injunctions, you have to clear two things,” Quill told Reuters. “You have to demonstrate there is an arguable case with reasonable grounds. If Djokovic gets over that first hurdle, the next thing is Balance of Convenience.

“This is where you balance the scales in regards to the imposition on each party and who will be hindered more if their rights are wrongly denied.”

Quill said he believed the Balance of Convenience could favour Djokovic.

“If it turns out the Home Affairs Minister is right and he ultimately wins the case, they can deport Djokovic then. It doesn’t really impact the minister too much,” Quill said.

“If it turns out Novak is right and that they never had the right to deport him, he can’t get back the chance at the 2022 Australian Open. He can’t get back his attempt to go down as the greatest ever grand slam winner in history.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in