Chris Grayling grilled over rail electrification programme as delays lead to soaring costs

Transport Secretary admits rail electrification is 'over budget and late'; his alternative will cost £63,000 per day on one line alone

Simon Calder
Travel Correspondent
Monday 22 January 2018 21:57
Comments
Chris Grayling grilled by Transport Committee over rail electrification

An hour into his long and uncomfortable journey, Chris Grayling said plaintively: “By now we were meant to be most of the way to Cardiff, and we’re not.”

The beleaguered Transport Secretary was talking about the lamentable delays and cost overruns for electrification of the Great Western Railway. But the 4.45pm Transport Select Committee was not, from Mr Grayling's point of view, making great progress either.

The Transport Secretary had been summoned to explain himself about a sudden change of track on electrification.

“There are a lot of communities right around the country that feel very aggrieved by the decision you have taken,” said Labour’s Luke Pollard. “They feel very betrayed and let down.”

Passengers from Leicester, Derby, Nottingham and all stations to Sheffield want to know why plans for electrification from London St Pancras to Sheffield had been abandoned less than halfway, at Kettering. (As Mr Grayling’s misfortune would have it, the committee is chaired by Labour’s Lilian Greenwood, whose Nottingham South constituents were rather looking forward to faster, cleaner trains to London.)

Travellers west of Cardiff, too, were keen to hear why the wires from London Paddington will stop at the Welsh capital rather than continuing to Swansea as originally planned.

The Transport Secretary said: “We tried to do too much electrification in one go.” He has decided to save money and trouble by the use of “bi-mode” – a mirror image of the Toyota Prius principle. Perfectly good electric trains are fitted with diesel motors and filled with fuel. This cargo is then carted around the country at 125mph, coming into its own only when the overhead wires run out.

“The worst of every world,” Labour’s Daniel Zeichner called the concept.

“Bi-mode” trains are heavier, which hampers performance and increases damage to the tracks. Maintenance is twice as expensive. The operational cost to the traveller and the taxpayer is alarming: on the Midland main line alone between London and Sheffield, the extra expense is £63,000 a day.

Bi for now: an InterCity Express Train on a test run at London Paddington, running on diesel and electricity

But Mr Grayling was unrepentant: “My job is to try to maximise the value to passengers of the investments that we make. And spending a billion pounds shaving a minute off the journey time to Sheffield at a time when there are capacity constraints elsewhere on the network still to be tackled, didn’t seem to be the best use of money.”

“I’ve not taken away any passenger benefits anywhere. These changes do not affect the passenger.”

They do, though, affect the environment. At a time when the Government is urging motorists to switch from diesel to electric cars, on the rails it is heading in the opposite direction.

As the 4.45pm from Paddington to Cardiff was approaching the Severn Tunnel, Ms Greenwood wondered why, if bi-mode was such as great idea, the underwater link between England and Wales had been closed for six weeks in 2016 for electrification.

Previous decisions had been flawed. The whole project, said Mr Grayling, was “over budget and late”.

But he hinted that long closures could affect passengers across the Pennines as the east-west route was improved: “If we could set up a plan to close that route for a month one summer and divert those trains elsewhere, we could do a whole lot of extra work.”

Something untoward in the Severn Tunnel disrupted the 4.45pm departure from Paddington. As a result, the 4.45pm Transport Select Committee hit the buffers a few minutes before the train reached Cardiff.

“Thank you, Secretary of State, for your time today,” said the committee chair.

“You’re welcome,” said Mr Grayling, with the weary look of a commuter at the end of an unexpectedly protracted two-hour journey, and who knew he would have to travel this way again.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in