Passenger must wear face coverings on Delta flights
Passenger must wear face coverings on Delta flights

Delta blacklists more than 100 passengers for refusing to wear masks, says airline boss

‘If you insist on not wearing your mask, we will insist that you don’t fly Delta,’ says CEO

Helen Coffey
Wednesday 05 August 2020 14:14
Comments

Delta has banned more than “100 people” from flying for refusing to wear a mask, according to the airline’s CEO.

Ed Bastian said that passengers who refused to comply with the carrier’s requirement that they wear face coverings at all times are being temporarily blacklisted.

“If you insist on not wearing your mask, we will insist that you don’t fly Delta,“ he told The Today Show last month.

Masks have been mandatory on Delta flights since 1 May.

The only people who are exempt are those with a relevant medical condition, something that must be established prior to the flight, during a pre-boarding process involving a consultation with a medical profession that can take up to an hour.

The airline warns passengers that ”any false claims of a disability or health condition to obtain an exemption from wearing a mask or face covering may result in the suspension of travel privileges on any Delta flight“.

The airline has temporarily stopped selling middle seats to better enable social distancing on board its flights.

As part of its stricter rules, Delta has also banned certain types of masks.

It recently updated its guidance to prohibit masks with a valve.

“Any mask with an exhaust valve is not approved as an acceptable face mask for customers travelling on any Delta operated flight,” says the policy.

This is because masks with a valve are designed to protect the wearer, not other people, as they filter what is being breathed in rather than out. They’re most commonly used in construction work or during wildfire season.

As early as May, the San Francisco Department of Public Health highlighted the issue, tweeting that masks “with the valves or openings on the front are NOT safe, and may actually propel your germs further.”

It referenced the city’s public health order, which stated: “Valves of that type permit droplet release from the mask, putting others at risk.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in