Sue Gray report: Partygoer vomited and scuffle broke out at No 10 leaving do

‘There was excessive alcohol consumption by some individuals,’ civil servant says

<p>Images of gatherings - including this one from 19 June 2020 - have been included in the full report </p>

Images of gatherings - including this one from 19 June 2020 - have been included in the full report

An individual threw up and a scuffle broke out at a No 10 official’s leaving do during Covid restrictions , according to Sue Gray’s full report into Partygate.

The civil servant said there was “excessive alcohol consumption” by some who attended the event, which took place as England was emerging from a strict lockdown.

Ms Gray’s report - published on Wednesday - is the clearest look at events that took place in No 10 and the Cabinet Office during Covid restrictions.

Among these is a leaving do for a No 10 private secretary held on 18 June 2020. At the time, two or more people were banned from meeting indoors at the time, with an exception allowed gatherings that were “reasonably necessary” for “work purposes”.

Ms Gray said it started in No 10, where leaving speeches were given and “some alcohol” was involved.

After an hour, she said it moved to 70 Whitehall with “alcohol, food and music”.

She said the second part of the leaving do started around 7.40pm and lasted “for a number of hours”.

“There was excessive alcohol consumption by some individuals. One individual was sick. There was a minor altercation between two other individuals.”

Ms Gray said the event broke up “in stages” with a few members of staff leaving from around 9pm. The final member of staff, who stayed to tidy up, left at 3.13am, she said.

Boris Johnson seen at a leaving do on 13 November 2020

The civil servant also looked at a party that took place on the eve of Prince Philip’s funeral, finding some individuals stayed on to carry on drinking alcohol “until the early hours”.

Overall, Ms Gray said there was a “serious failure” to abide by “standards expected of the entire British population” during the Covid pandemic.

“Some of the events should not have been allowed to take place. Other events should not have been allowed to develop as they did,” she said.

Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak are seen at a gathering for the prime minister’s birthday on 19 June 2020

Ms Gray published a heavily-redacted “update” to her inquiry in January while the Metropolitan Police carried out its investigation into events held at No 10 and Whitehall during the Covid pandemic. The police probe resulted in 126 fines, including to the prime minister and chancellor.

Her full report includes a series of photos of events - all of which involve Boris Johnson.

The UK prime minister will make a Commons statement later on Wednesday, then hold a press conference to apologise directly to the public.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in